MESO-Rx Sponsor Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

[Mcflyfast]

Totally safe . I have expired amps of thier sust. Have no worry about injecting once I do.

@Pharmacom Labs tabs I understand, but would the oils in vials eventually go rancid?

 

[PHL Official]

@Pharmacom Labs tabs I understand, but would the oils in vials eventually go rancid?

We use preservants. If vials are stored correctly, nothing happens to oil.

 

[ItsDaBoii]

We use preservants. If vials are stored correctly, nothing happens to oil.

how long can you store the water based stuff like test suspension?

 

[grey]

ut would the oils in vials eventually go rancid?

You need a far amount of oxygen in the vial for that to happen.

 

[RThoads]

how long can you store the water based stuff like test suspension?

I do not have first-hand experience with suspensions. However, if all is stored properly and has never been used (meaning the cap never removed and no pin ever breached the stopper/septum) it should last a long time. But with anything water-based, I personally am not as comfortable with the idea of using something many years old. I even keep my own personal BAC water (new sealed vials) in zip-lock bags in the refrigerator (I know they are BAC water so by definition they have anti-bacterial properties and a preservative, but it will not hurt them to be kept clean, less air flow, and cold -- it can only help).
I would say the reality is something sterile, with preservative, and sealed, should last many years. But my own feelings just are not as comfortbale using something water based that is many years old.

 

[ItsDaBoii]

I do not have first-hand experience with suspensions. However, if all is stored properly and has never been used (meaning the cap never removed and no pin ever breached the stopper/septum) it should last a long time. But with anything water-based, I personally am not as comfortable with the idea of using something many years old. I even keep my own personal BAC water (new sealed vials) in zip-lock bags in the refrigerator (I know they are BAC water so by definition they have anti-bacterial properties and a preservative, but it will not hurt them to be kept clean, less air flow, and cold -- it can only help).
I would say the reality is something sterile, with preservative, and sealed, should last many years. But my own feelings just are not as comfortbale using something water based that is many years old.

damn used ur tren base before the lockdown and now (4 months later) i still have 7ml left... not sure if i should risk it honestly

 

[RThoads]

damn used ur tren base before the lockdown and now (4 months later) i still have 7ml left... not sure if i should risk it honestly

If you wiped the top of the stopped with alcohol and let dry a couple times (sterilized) before you punctured it each time you used it, and always used a brand-new sterile needle (we all should be doing this anyway for obvious reasons) it should still be ok.

But for me, I know there is always a little risk that when I punctured the stopped my needle brought something into the vile and jeapordized the sterility. The bacteriostatic agent (such as BA) is there to help. However, my own personal preference, I feel better not even risking an already used vial because in the big picture of things one vial costs nearly nothing compared to any health issue (even a very unlikely one that I may never see occure even if I took the risk 1000 times -- just not worth any risk to me just to save a few bucks).

With oils, I feel more comfortable resuming use of a used vial after months of proper storage (because I know I wiped it multiple times with fresh sterile alcohol pads each use and always used a brand-new sterile pin). Maybe it is just me and all in my head but I do not feel as comfortable with water-based.

For multiple-years storages products, even with oils I would only consider using brand-new never-used never opened. I have used never used oils that are 5+ years old without any issue. I still have some Watson from Walgreen’s (TRT script) that are over 5 years old but the cap still on and stored in a cool, dry, dark place, in a box upright with stopper facing up (not oil sitting on teh stopper for 5 years) – I have no worry about using them, for example.

 

[RThoads]

Repost of Information from the Source
Below is simply a repost of the information @Pharmacom Labs recently posted because (at least on my end) some of the images did not display properly. All I did was go to the link of each image, download each, and rehost them so they will all display. No changes to the content have been made; as such all content and words posted below are those of the original author (cited and quoted for reference at the end of the reposted content):

"
So, in my previous post I stated we are sure that anastrozol we have contains anastrozol, not letrozol. This is my point still. I do not have myself chemical background, so I could probably not completely understand all tiny testing details, but I will translate to you info provided by our specialist.

As explained earlier we ordered raws stock in advance due to rumors about possible raws lack in future. Those raws were tested and we use them in the current batch we have in stock. Currently international warehouse has batch number PHAN00007E. We tested it today again.

As a reference sample we used anastrozol from Tocris bioscience, which is a pharma grade supplier and causes no doubts in its quality. its like more known Merck.

See photo attached.

And here are screenshots from our analysis software interface:

Here you see 2 peaks. Blue peak is for reference sample Tocris bioscience. Grey peak is our anastrozolos from current batch PHAN00007E. They match. These peaks are typical for anastrozol.

Another view from our software. Yellow is Tocris bioscience reference sample, blue is our anastrozol.

This screenshot is ready report for current batch in our stock PHAN00007E.

Anyone (preferably with some history and reputation on this board) who has doubts and has this batch on hands can send his/her sample to a lab. We will only welcome this extra check.

So, after repeat test we are sure that the batch currently we have in stock at international warehouse at least is anastrozol.

Next, I contacted magaboss13 and asked to provide his batch number and photo. He did it. He got batch PHAN00002E. It was ordered from US domestic warehouse. This is a very old batch, which was produced from other raws long before coronavirus broke out. That batch was produced in April 2018.

On our site we have for a long time report from Simec certified lab for this batch from August 2018. You can see it here

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

This report is from August 2018 and it is for batch PHAN00002E. This report has its individual number C74226. I think if you contact Simec, provide this number they will validate and confirm that this report is genuine, not faked. As per this report our pills have exactly 1 mg of anastrozol in it. Reports from Simec can be trusted even more than our own reports I guess. This is an accredited certified lab in Switzerland.

So...I am just lost at this point. Really no idea, how come is that possible that one report shows it is anastrozol and another report shows it is letrozol...Our international warehouse does not have this batch in stock anymore, so we can not test it now.

US domestic warehouse seems to have some packages left. I asked our local warehouse to revise all anastrozol, sort out all packages with batch PHAN00002E and put it aside so far. Since situation is really odd, we will not send it to you. We are revising our stock there now. If we find more packages with this batch left, it would be nice to test it somewhere else. We do not have an opportunity to import it from the USA to our own lab. I have also contacted Simec and they are refusing to work with non-GMP certified manufacturers due to misuse of their reports. If we find more packages with this batch it would be nice to test samples in some other third-side lab. Not at Janoshik. No disrespect. But you all see what we have. Simec shows one thing, Janoshik shows another thing. I asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports. However, obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed. So far we remove this batch from our shelves at US domestic warehouse, if we find some pieces left. I have not received warehouse revision report yet.
"
source: MESO-Rx Sponsor - Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

So, in my previous post I stated we are sure that anastrozol we have contains anastrozol, not letrozol. This is my point still. I do not have myself chemical background, so I could probably not completely understand all tiny testing details, but I will translate to you info provided by our specialist.

As explained earlier we ordered raws stock in advance due to rumors about possible raws lack in future. Those raws were tested and we use them in the current batch we have in stock. Currently international warehouse has batch number PHAN00007E. We tested it today again.

As a reference sample we used anastrozol from Tocris bioscience, which is a pharma grade supplier and causes no doubts in its quality. its like more known Merck.

See photo attached.







And here are screenshots from our analysis software interface:



Here you see 2 peaks. Blue peak is for reference sample Tocris bioscience. Grey peak is our anastrozolos from current batch PHAN00007E. They match. These peaks are typical for anastrozol.

Another view from our software. Yellow is Tocris bioscience reference sample, blue is our anastrozol.



This screenshot is ready report for current batch in our stock PHAN00007E.



Anyone (preferably with some history and reputation on this board) who has doubts and has this batch on hands can send his/her sample to a lab. We will only welcome this extra check.

So, after repeat test we are sure that the batch currently we have in stock at international warehouse at least is anastrozol.

Next, I contacted magaboss13 and asked to provide his batch number and photo. He did it. He got batch PHAN00002E. It was ordered from US domestic warehouse. This is a very old batch, which was produced from other raws long before coronavirus broke out. That batch was produced in April 2018.



On our site we have for a long time report from Simec certified lab for this batch from August 2018. You can see it here

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

This report is from August 2018 and it is for batch PHAN00002E. This report has its individual number C74226. I think if you contact Simec, provide this number they will validate and confirm that this report is genuine, not faked. As per this report our pills have exactly 1 mg of anastrozol in it. Reports from Simec can be trusted even more than our own reports I guess. This is an accredited certified lab in Switzerland.

So...I am just lost at this point. Really no idea, how come is that possible that one report shows it is anastrozol and another report shows it is letrozol...Our international warehouse does not have this batch in stock anymore, so we can not test it now.

US domestic warehouse seems to have some packages left. I asked our local warehouse to revise all anastrozol, sort out all packages with batch PHAN00002E and put it aside so far. Since situation is really odd, we will not send it to you. We are revising our stock there now. If we find more packages with this batch left, it would be nice to test it somewhere else. We do not have an opportunity to import it from the USA to our own lab. I have also contacted Simec and they are refusing to work with non-GMP certified manufacturers due to misuse of their reports. If we find more packages with this batch it would be nice to test samples in some other third-side lab. Not at Janoshik. No disrespect. But you all see what we have. Simec shows one thing, Janoshik shows another thing. I asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports. However, obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed. So far we remove this batch from our shelves at US domestic warehouse, if we find some pieces left. I have not received warehouse revision report yet.

 

[Pharmacom Support]

Mohamed Elemam - PRO athlete team Pharmacom Labs.

Link to Mohamed's instagram profile, follow the news.

www.instagram.com/mohammed_elemam_/

 

[magaboss13]

Repost of Information from the Source
Below is simply a repost of the information @Pharmacom Labs recently posted because (at least on my end) some of the images did not display properly. All I did was go to the link of each image, download each, and rehost them so they will all display. No changes to the content have been made; as such all content and words posted below are those of the original author (cited and quoted for reference at the end of the reposted content):

"
So, in my previous post I stated we are sure that anastrozol we have contains anastrozol, not letrozol. This is my point still. I do not have myself chemical background, so I could probably not completely understand all tiny testing details, but I will translate to you info provided by our specialist.

As explained earlier we ordered raws stock in advance due to rumors about possible raws lack in future. Those raws were tested and we use them in the current batch we have in stock. Currently international warehouse has batch number PHAN00007E. We tested it today again.

As a reference sample we used anastrozol from Tocris bioscience, which is a pharma grade supplier and causes no doubts in its quality. its like more known Merck.

See photo attached.

And here are screenshots from our analysis software interface:

Here you see 2 peaks. Blue peak is for reference sample Tocris bioscience. Grey peak is our anastrozolos from current batch PHAN00007E. They match. These peaks are typical for anastrozol.

Another view from our software. Yellow is Tocris bioscience reference sample, blue is our anastrozol.

This screenshot is ready report for current batch in our stock PHAN00007E.

Anyone (preferably with some history and reputation on this board) who has doubts and has this batch on hands can send his/her sample to a lab. We will only welcome this extra check.

So, after repeat test we are sure that the batch currently we have in stock at international warehouse at least is anastrozol.

Next, I contacted magaboss13 and asked to provide his batch number and photo. He did it. He got batch PHAN00002E. It was ordered from US domestic warehouse. This is a very old batch, which was produced from other raws long before coronavirus broke out. That batch was produced in April 2018.

On our site we have for a long time report from Simec certified lab for this batch from August 2018. You can see it here

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

This report is from August 2018 and it is for batch PHAN00002E. This report has its individual number C74226. I think if you contact Simec, provide this number they will validate and confirm that this report is genuine, not faked. As per this report our pills have exactly 1 mg of anastrozol in it. Reports from Simec can be trusted even more than our own reports I guess. This is an accredited certified lab in Switzerland.

So...I am just lost at this point. Really no idea, how come is that possible that one report shows it is anastrozol and another report shows it is letrozol...Our international warehouse does not have this batch in stock anymore, so we can not test it now.

US domestic warehouse seems to have some packages left. I asked our local warehouse to revise all anastrozol, sort out all packages with batch PHAN00002E and put it aside so far. Since situation is really odd, we will not send it to you. We are revising our stock there now. If we find more packages with this batch left, it would be nice to test it somewhere else. We do not have an opportunity to import it from the USA to our own lab. I have also contacted Simec and they are refusing to work with non-GMP certified manufacturers due to misuse of their reports. If we find more packages with this batch it would be nice to test samples in some other third-side lab. Not at Janoshik. No disrespect. But you all see what we have. Simec shows one thing, Janoshik shows another thing. I asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports. However, obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed. So far we remove this batch from our shelves at US domestic warehouse, if we find some pieces left. I have not received warehouse revision report yet.
"
source: MESO-Rx Sponsor - Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

So what are my options? What do I need to do to A. make sure what I have is adex. Or B. Get adex? Do I need to get it tested again? Or if you are no longer supplying that batch number, will I get a replacement?

 

[RThoads]

So what are my options? What do I need to do to A. make sure what I have is adex.

SIMEC testing show it is adex.
The source's testing shows it is adex.
Jano testing shows it is letro.
I respect both (and Frank has also stated he is not doubting Jano -- from what Frank wrote, it sounds like the source even paid to have it tested again).

I would appreciate if I could see what ChemTox or another 3rd-party lab concludes. I know it is not practical and unlikely to occur; but, at this point I am also just interested because I am NOT doubting any of these tests, services, or labs -- but the results are not the same so I am curious.

Or B. Get adex? Do I need to get it tested again? Or if you are no longer supplying that batch number, will I get a replacement?

Are you already in direct communication with Frank (@Pharmacom Labs ), or the source's customer service, via email?

As you can see from my re-post of Frank's information, the source has data from SIMEC that shows these raws where Adex -- so there is a disagreement on the conclusion and more investigation is needed.

Here is what we know so far:
•SIMEC testing showed the batch was made from raws that are adex.
•Nonetheless, as Frank stated, he "asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports."
•Clearly the source is not trying to scam anyone because it would not make any sense to provide an expensive compound at such a precise measured amount (it was nearly perfectly 1mg testing at 0.97mg) -- this rules out any profit incentive or skipping measuring etc.
•Regardless of your individual situation or interest, at this point even the source wants to know more and, according to Frank, "obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed."
•INTL Warehouses do not have any of this batch left in stock; the source has removed this batch from their shelves at US domestic warehouse.

If you are already in direct communications with Frank from Basicstero, then he will handle it from here.
But if you are not, let me know (here or PM) and I will try to help. I do not have any special access to accounts, orders, or any authority to send out products etc. but I can at least help facilitate communication and/or help reach a resolution.


For anyone that reads my reply here and does not understand the context and/or needs some background about what we are talking about here, my recent post below is a summary from Frank of what we know so far:

Repost of Information from the Source
Below is simply a repost of the information @Pharmacom Labs recently posted because (at least on my end) some of the images did not display properly. All I did was go to the link of each image, download each, and rehost them so they will all display. No changes to the content have been made; as such all content and words posted below are those of the original author (cited and quoted for reference at the end of the reposted content):

"
So, in my previous post I stated we are sure that anastrozol we have contains anastrozol, not letrozol. This is my point still. I do not have myself chemical background, so I could probably not completely understand all tiny testing details, but I will translate to you info provided by our specialist.

As explained earlier we ordered raws stock in advance due to rumors about possible raws lack in future. Those raws were tested and we use them in the current batch we have in stock. Currently international warehouse has batch number PHAN00007E. We tested it today again.

As a reference sample we used anastrozol from Tocris bioscience, which is a pharma grade supplier and causes no doubts in its quality. its like more known Merck.

See photo attached.

And here are screenshots from our analysis software interface:

Here you see 2 peaks. Blue peak is for reference sample Tocris bioscience. Grey peak is our anastrozolos from current batch PHAN00007E. They match. These peaks are typical for anastrozol.

Another view from our software. Yellow is Tocris bioscience reference sample, blue is our anastrozol.

This screenshot is ready report for current batch in our stock PHAN00007E.

Anyone (preferably with some history and reputation on this board) who has doubts and has this batch on hands can send his/her sample to a lab. We will only welcome this extra check.

So, after repeat test we are sure that the batch currently we have in stock at international warehouse at least is anastrozol.

Next, I contacted magaboss13 and asked to provide his batch number and photo. He did it. He got batch PHAN00002E. It was ordered from US domestic warehouse. This is a very old batch, which was produced from other raws long before coronavirus broke out. That batch was produced in April 2018.

On our site we have for a long time report from Simec certified lab for this batch from August 2018. You can see it here

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

This report is from August 2018 and it is for batch PHAN00002E. This report has its individual number C74226. I think if you contact Simec, provide this number they will validate and confirm that this report is genuine, not faked. As per this report our pills have exactly 1 mg of anastrozol in it. Reports from Simec can be trusted even more than our own reports, I guess. This is an accredited certified lab in Switzerland.

So...I am just lost at this point. Really no idea, how come is that possible that one report shows it is anastrozol and another report shows it is letrozol...Our international warehouse does not have this batch in stock anymore, so we can not test it now.

US domestic warehouse seems to have some packages left. I asked our local warehouse to revise all anastrozol, sort out all packages with batch PHAN00002E and put it aside so far. Since situation is really odd, we will not send it to you. We are revising our stock there now. If we find more packages with this batch left, it would be nice to test it somewhere else. We do not have an opportunity to import it from the USA to our own lab. I have also contacted Simec and they are refusing to work with non-GMP certified manufacturers due to misuse of their reports. If we find more packages with this batch it would be nice to test samples in some other third-side lab. Not at Janoshik. No disrespect. But you all see what we have. Simec shows one thing, Janoshik shows another thing. I asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports. However, obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed. So far we remove this batch from our shelves at US domestic warehouse, if we find some pieces left. I have not received warehouse revision report yet.
"
source: MESO-Rx Sponsor - Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

 

[Nik777]

do you want to know what happened? from the outside the explanation is simple. the raw materials are correct, the dosage is correct, the final product is different. you made adex using letro barrels. exchange of raw materials in production. what explanation are you looking for. this means that you do not have post production control but only control the raw materials.

 

[RThoads]

do you want to know what happened? from the outside the explanation is simple. the raw materials are correct, the dosage is correct, the final product is different. you made adex using letro barrels. exchange of raw materials in production. what explanation are you looking for. this means that you do not have post production control but only control the raw materials.

Finished product analysis reported that the final product is excellent.
The finished product was analyzed by the independent 3rd-party lab SIMEC and shows good results. So, this info refutes your narrative.
There has been a report from SIMEC analytic lab for this batch from August 2018; You can see it here:

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

---

I remember other independent wikibolics tests reading shit in phcom products

Yes, I also remember that other claim as well.
Please see the quote below because that guy was honorable and came back and explained the alleged "bad results" were NOT accurate.

Hello everyone,

I have posted before some results from wikibolics, that shows many tests underdosed, like tren E tested twice 50% underdosed

MESO-Rx Sponsor - Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

So I checked by sending a tren E 200 to Janoshik, I don't trust wikibolics results, another guy verified their meditech results.

Wikibolics lab tests can't be trusted.

Mfg date: 2017-01
Exp date: 2022-01
Batch Nr: PHTR00002EV

https://janoshik.com/tests/8187-AAS_oil_%22Facial_Recovery_Oil%22_ZAD1XRHQL7FP (Janoshik Analytical)

Or in that case do you suddenly not trust Jano's results and think Wikibolics was correct that time?
Which perfect testing is the true result? how does it work? is it only the results that criticize the source count? But when further investigation shows the source was correct, that data does not count?

Why is it you seem to remember that accusation, BUT you failed to remember the resolution and the FACT even the one who originally posted the claim came back and provided new information showing he found the criticism was incorrect.
You failed to remember the part that showed Pharmacom was right.

---

hi Pharmacom

can you explain this labtest

Bloodwork Pharmacon

Hey all, First post but hopefully it helps people in the future. Was injecting 540 mg wk test E from pharmacon. Blood total test came back at 1366 which was 2 hours before my next injection. This all took place on week 11 of my cycle.

thinksteroids.com

and here, in the quote above, you asked about a bloodwork, but did you ever go back and see the guy stated his vial was NOT purchased from Basicstero and determined it was a fake (therefore, nothing to do with Pharmacom or Basicstero):

Vials quality code was a fake so my oil is bunk (very underdosed). Still was a nice little cycle but this doesn't reflect on pharmcom at all as its not their product. Just a fake.

Seems like you only look at the start of a topic when it seems negative, but not the conclusions that show Basicstero/Pharmacom are good.

In the end, this source's reputation speaks for itself -- just look at all the EXCELLENT HPLC results and thousands of satisfied customers.

Please think logically for a moment, would this source still be in business with this much demand year after year (it hard to keep things in stock with so much demand) if the products were not good?

Basicstero and Pharmacom have an excellent reputation that was earned from many years of thousands of satisfied customers and many good analysis results: Pharmacom Labs Archives - Anabolic Lab

 

[PHL Official]

do you want to know what happened? from the outside the explanation is simple. the raw materials are correct, the dosage is correct, the final product is different. you made adex using letro barrels. exchange of raw materials in production. what explanation are you looking for. this means that you do not have post production control but only control the raw materials.

Simec tested not raws, but final product - pills. Your suggestion is wrong.

 

[normalkev]

Simec tested not raws, but final product - pills. Your suggestion is wrong.

Just ordered arimidex from us warehouse last night? Is the batch in question out of inventory? I’m concerned I will get letro, not arimidex.

 

[normalkev]

Simec tested not raws, but final product - pills. Your suggestion is wrong.

Can you please confirm the batch in question is out of the us warehouse inventory? What lot/batch number is in question? I just ordered arimidex last night from you and am concerned.

 

[RThoads]

Just ordered arimidex from us warehouse last night? Is the batch in question out of inventory? I’m concerned I will get letro, not arimidex.

Here is the analytic result from SIMEC for that batch (according to Frank from Pharmacom Labs):

Can you please confirm the batch in question is out of the us warehouse inventory? What lot/batch number is in question? I just ordered arimidex last night from you and am concerned.

Please see the very recent post quoted below that answers your question and concerns:

Repost of Information from the Source
Below is simply a repost of the information @Pharmacom Labs recently posted because (at least on my end) some of the images did not display properly. All I did was go to the link of each image, download each, and rehost them so they will all display. No changes to the content have been made; as such all content and words posted below are those of the original author (cited and quoted for reference at the end of the reposted content):

"
So, in my previous post I stated we are sure that anastrozol we have contains anastrozol, not letrozol. This is my point still. I do not have myself chemical background, so I could probably not completely understand all tiny testing details, but I will translate to you info provided by our specialist.

As explained earlier we ordered raws stock in advance due to rumors about possible raws lack in future. Those raws were tested and we use them in the current batch we have in stock. Currently international warehouse has batch number PHAN00007E. We tested it today again.

As a reference sample we used anastrozol from Tocris bioscience, which is a pharma grade supplier and causes no doubts in its quality. its like more known Merck.

See photo attached.

And here are screenshots from our analysis software interface:

Here you see 2 peaks. Blue peak is for reference sample Tocris bioscience. Grey peak is our anastrozolos from current batch PHAN00007E. They match. These peaks are typical for anastrozol.

Another view from our software. Yellow is Tocris bioscience reference sample, blue is our anastrozol.

This screenshot is ready report for current batch in our stock PHAN00007E.

Anyone (preferably with some history and reputation on this board) who has doubts and has this batch on hands can send his/her sample to a lab. We will only welcome this extra check.

So, after repeat test we are sure that the batch currently we have in stock at international warehouse at least is anastrozol.

Next, I contacted magaboss13 and asked to provide his batch number and photo. He did it. He got batch PHAN00002E. It was ordered from US domestic warehouse. This is a very old batch, which was produced from other raws long before coronavirus broke out. That batch was produced in April 2018.

On our site we have for a long time report from Simec certified lab for this batch from August 2018. You can see it here

https://int.basicstero.ws/public/pdf/anastrozolos.pdf

This report is from August 2018 and it is for batch PHAN00002E. This report has its individual number C74226. I think if you contact Simec, provide this number they will validate and confirm that this report is genuine, not faked. As per this report our pills have exactly 1 mg of anastrozol in it. Reports from Simec can be trusted even more than our own reports I guess. This is an accredited certified lab in Switzerland.

So...I am just lost at this point. Really no idea, how come is that possible that one report shows it is anastrozol and another report shows it is letrozol...Our international warehouse does not have this batch in stock anymore, so we can not test it now.

US domestic warehouse seems to have some packages left. I asked our local warehouse to revise all anastrozol, sort out all packages with batch PHAN00002E and put it aside so far. Since situation is really odd, we will not send it to you. We are revising our stock there now. If we find more packages with this batch left, it would be nice to test it somewhere else. We do not have an opportunity to import it from the USA to our own lab. I have also contacted Simec and they are refusing to work with non-GMP certified manufacturers due to misuse of their reports. If we find more packages with this batch it would be nice to test samples in some other third-side lab. Not at Janoshik. No disrespect. But you all see what we have. Simec shows one thing, Janoshik shows another thing. I asked Janoshik to do an extra test and paid for it. It confirmed the first result. It showed letrozol. It is hard to deny chromotography reports, so there is no way I deny Janoshik`s reports. However, obviously further analysis of this batch from a third-side lab is needed. So far we remove this batch from our shelves at US domestic warehouse, if we find some pieces left. I have not received warehouse revision report yet.
"
source: MESO-Rx Sponsor - Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

 

[normalkev]

Simec tested not raws, but final product - pills. Your suggestion is wrong.

Good morning,

Are you having additional issues with your us website? I tried to log in this morning and my account is not recognized anymore and seems was deleted. I placed an order last night and already sent in my Bitcoin and updated the order page with the Bitcoin details. Now my account is deleted. How can I confirm you still have my order details and will ship?

 

[RThoads]

Good morning,

Are you having additional issues with your us website? I tried to log in this morning and my account is not recognized anymore and seems was deleted. I placed an order last night and already sent in my Bitcoin and updated the order page with the Bitcoin details. Now my account is deleted. How can I confirm you still have my order details and will ship?

I have not heard of any issues today.
Please, make sure you are trying to sign inot teh same warehouse with which you have the account. Each warehouse section is still currently seperate (a new site is planned for the future where there will be one login).
By this i mean, if your order was in teh US domestic, make sure you are trying to login to the US Domestic warehouse store section not the INTL.

Try and let me know if that helps.

 

[Pharmacom Support]

PHARMATEST PH 100.

Each milliliter of PHARMATEST PH 100 contains 100 milligrams of Testosterone Phenylpropionate. This testosterone ester is active for 4-5 days, is a cross between testosterone cypionate and propionate.

Effects of PHARMATEST PH 100:
+ Quickly increases strength.
+ Reduces the percentage of body fat and increases muscle relief.
+ Visibly builds muscle mass.

Has anyone already tried it? We will be glad to hear your opinion, feedback, suggestions or questions.