By your response u never were put in front of a judge and had to do time.
Correct and IMO that’s a good thing, but
exposure to judges and attorneys is a part of med malpractice that I’m a part of.
And patients come from various backgrounds and demographics that often impacts and is a part of the discovery process.
The notion someone should never admit fault is, to be frank absurd, bc that’s the very essence of plea bargaining, since the facts of a case often reveal the extent of culpability on behalf of a defendant regardless of a formal admission of guilt.
Judges are smart and well educated professionals that can see the forest thru the trees, and when a judge connects the dots and those dots reveal a pattern of maladaptive behavior on behalf of a defendant they tend to rule following
the dictum “whatever is in the best interest of a child”.
And if scientific testing reveals AAS were in part responsible for reprehensible behavior they will restrict visitation to
“supervised only” until the cause (as he sees it) is no longer a threat, to the child.
To that end its remarkable some will continue a habit or addiction that is/has/was destroying their lives.
Jim