PurplePandaLabs Raw source

i enjoy a good conspiracy theory too, but extrapolating one from the fact that Roger gives this source hell hold's no weight.

For those that remember the Trinity thread, i gave that shit bag hell, all day, every day.

Was it because i was being paid by another source to do so? Not a fucking chance. i can't be bought by a source. Plain and simple.

i did it because that mother fucker was sketchy from day one. Had the mouth and the reading/writing skill's of a child and was only here to make quick money, then bounce. Which he ultimately did, with a couple outstanding noob orders.

So why do "source bashers" like myself and Roger do it? To make Meso a safer place and hold these sources to a higher standard. Given the recent revelations with PPL, it should be pretty obvious why Roger does what he does.

Next @master.on conspiracy... @MisterSuperGod is @Roger rabbit :D (Yes, i tagged myself). o_O:p
Let me kick off this latest conspiracy of you and RR being one and the same - RR uses Tap-a-talk, including the ability to use current emojis made popular on iPhone and Android phones. You are still using the Meso provided emojis. Good diversion tactic MisterSuperRabbit, but I’m on to you.
 
Panda at one time stated he was hiring a new brewer who has been brewing for a while and has lots of experience almost right after the elite labs guy was supposedly let go
That's the part that cracks me up the most, he kept the hairy gear brewer on, and i love what he called a warehouse
 
i enjoy a good conspiracy theory too, but extrapolating one from the fact that Roger gives this source hell hold's no weight.

For those that remember the Trinity thread, i gave that shit bag hell, all day, every day.

Was it because i was being paid by another source to do so? Not a fucking chance. i can't be bought by a source. Plain and simple.

i did it because that mother fucker was sketchy from day one. Had the mouth and the reading/writing skill's of a child and was only here to make quick money, then bounce. Which he ultimately did, with a couple outstanding noob orders.

So why do "source bashers" like myself and Roger do it? To make Meso a safer place and hold these sources to a higher standard. Given the recent revelations with PPL, it should be pretty obvious why Roger does what he does.

Next @master.on conspiracy... @MisterSuperGod is @Roger rabbit :D (Yes, i tagged myself). o_O:p
So you would have us believe but in reality @MisterSuperGod @Roger rabbit and @master.on are all one in the same. Hired by ppl to create doubt and confusion only to be told by the rep it’s all good so people will think it’s just the typical As Meso Turns drama. Noobs will think it’s squabble and buy plenty of delicious aas from the brand new LE proof domestic brewing facility. I mean it’s pretty fucking genius. Create confusion. Then open domestic under bright lights and rainbows and unicorns and shit. Noobs O plenty will flock to them. Fuck even as I write this I’m placing an order. Fuckin ppl. You evil genius.
 
Haven't seen the rep around in a bit. did he quit yet?

He basically put us on call...if we need him we need to email him or some shit like that

That's good enough for me he was annoying as fuck and not giving up his handle makes him look worse than backing this shit show.
In retrospect, it is pretty stupid to discuss any order info by PM in ANY BOARD

What if the board is hacked? Especially those without https
What if the board is owned by LE?

Please be aware that I'm just talking about discussion boards in general, not Meso specific.
 
It's easy to say something is for harm reduction. But harm reduction doesnt encompass which source to use or not, in my opinion at least.

I'm catching up in this thread since it's a slow work day. But this is a terribly dumb statement...

If a source is sending out bacterial infested gear and causing infections, you don't think people should share that information in order to warn others , thus REDUCING HARM???

that's just one example, and it's ridiculous I'm even having to spell it out after that comment ...
 
I'm catching up in this thread since it's a slow work day. But this is a terribly dumb statement...

If a source is sending out bacterial infested gear and causing infections, you don't think people should share that information in order to warn others , thus REDUCING HARM???

that's just one example, and it's ridiculous I'm even having to spell it out after that comment ...
You're entitled to your opinion. I dont think think harm reduction is about swaying members to use a source or not. That's my opinion. I think people just use that as an excuse to troll.

Opinions. You have one, I have one.
 
You're entitled to your opinion. I dont think think harm reduction is about swaying members to use a source or not. That's my opinion. I think people just use that as an excuse to troll.

Opinions. You have one, I have one.

Swaying members from a source that just had their brewer raided would certainly fall under harm reduction. IMO.

Whether it's as dire a situation as it's made out to be or not, better safe than sorry prevails here.

Nice to see you again by the way.
 
Swaying members from a source that just had their brewer raided would certainly fall under harm reduction. IMO.

Whether it's as dire a situation as it's made out to be or not, better safe than sorry prevails here.

Nice to see you again by the way.

It would be that simple. Under normal circumstances, a source gets busted, you cant use them again. They're busted. This situation is unique in that, hes a source through proxy. So he cant get busted. Only his minions(so to say).

Logically I would hope people would err on the side of caution and just not use them. But I'm realistic. I know people will still use them.

To me harm reduction is about having properly labeled gear, properly dosed gear. Obviously the extreme example @Dw725 gave, as if you would have to tell someone not to use a source that's bottling aids, if only every decision was that easy.

They'll always be a possibility for legal ramifications. Itll never be zero. So how can legal ramifications come into play towards harm reduction?
 
It would be that simple. Under normal circumstances, a source gets busted, you cant use them again. They're busted. This situation is unique in that, hes a source through proxy. So he cant get busted. Only his minions(so to say).

Logically I would hope people would err on the side of caution and just not use them. But I'm realistic. I know people will still use them.

To me harm reduction is about having properly labeled gear, properly dosed gear. Obviously the extreme example @Dw725 gave, as if you would have to tell someone not to use a source that's bottling aids, if only every decision was that easy.

They'll always be a possibility for legal ramifications. Itll never be zero. So how can legal ramifications come into play towards harm reduction?
My issue is that he lied and said he got away from the hairy gear producing brewer.
 
My issue is that he lied and said he got away from the hairy gear producing brewer.
That's my issue too, actually.

I'm not sure of the specifics. He either lied about what you said, or lied about the fact that it was his current domestic shop that got busted.
 
Back
Top