PurplePandaLabs Raw source

So, tell me what we should be looking for from a source in the VET process?

The vet process is different everytime depending on who is involved in the thread... Probably the most common trend on Meso is wearing the source down until he loses professionalism and starts to slip.

In general, if a source complies with every reasonable request and answers every question we're off to a good start.

Unfortunately, this source does not have a long reputation to track and only being on Reddit gives me a bit of pause. Time will tell I suppose... I appreciate the fact he's complied with all requests so far but sometimes that's just not enough.

Also if he did say email me whos to say it wasnt le requesting just to get the email?

I've tested a few sources just to see if they'd take a PM order, I've always been given an email thankfully... LE can easily get the email but that doesn't put me or a source in China in any danger.

BTW, the article about Reddit giving over user data should be read in full in case anyone didn't make it past the headline...

Reddit Reveals How Often It Hands Over Your Info to The Government

Of all the thousands of people that are on Reddit, they handed over user data 32 times... 7 of which were emergency requests that are submitted when authority's believe a user's life may be in immediate danger. I won't rewrite the whole article here but these are a few perspective points. All other users were notified about the situation prior to them submitting the user data unless they were forbidden from doing so.

Reddit is a huge board and AAS are a rather small part of it as far as I know... I'm not saying I condone sources on Reddit but I also just don't buy that we're all in danger by one of them sourcing there and then trying to get in the door here.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 64518 View attachment 64514
This is one of their official reports address at the bottom and phone # company name at the top. Also, what lie exactly did I get caught in?
Check the testing report
No RN20162090164A
Doesn't that look like a 2016 date?
I know the chinese type the year first, month and day
as evidenced by the date acquired and date processed fields

And check this DEA paper on how to analyze for steroids with HPLC peaks info
http://www.swgdrug.org/Monographs/TESTOSTERONE_AND_ESTERS.pdf
Testosterone Enanthate RRT should be 1.5, that on PPL "report" about 1.121
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
 
Last edited:
@Eman I'm pretty sure i read the entire article, but the chart showing that 29 subpoenas covering 30 user accounts doesn't sound like an emergancy. Only 7 of the 55 requests from Intl requests, civil, US Subpoenas and search warrants were emergency.
 
@Eman I'm pretty sure i read the entire article, but the chart showing that 29 subpoenas covering 30 user accounts doesn't sound like an emergancy. Only 7 of the 55 requests from Intl requests, civil, US Subpoenas and search warrants were emergency.

That is exactly what I said:

Of all the thousands of people that are on Reddit, they handed over user data 32 times... 7 of which were emergency requests that are submitted when authority's believe a user's life may be in immediate danger.

My original point was that just because this source is on Reddit does not mean we should have legitimate concerns about LE following them here... Know why? They're already here.
 
A better question would be to @Millard Baker does LE ever request any information from meso? And how does meso handle those requests?
MESO has never received a request for any type of user information from a law enforcement agency in over 20 years. MESO would only share information specified by a legally-valid court order in the appropriate jurisdiction (after consultation with its own legal counsel).
 
Check the testing report
No RN20162090164A
Doesn't that look like a 2016 date?
I know the chinese type the year first, month and day
as evidenced by the date acquired and date processed fields

And check this DEA paper on how to analyze for steroids with HPLC peaks info
http://www.swgdrug.org/Monographs/TESTOSTERONE_AND_ESTERS.pdf
Testosterone Enanthate RRT should be 1.5, that on PPL "report" about 1.121
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT
I was mistaken at first by believing the "report" BS
All peak data is completely different

Now look how a Testosterone Enanthate chart was supposed to look (look at peak 4)
according to WATERS the manufacturer of the same machine PPL claims to own, right from the official website
http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/wc6-4-4.pdf
totally different

So we can safely conclude this is a MADE-UP TEST RESULT
EXPOSED ENOUGH?

Not enough?
Do you still want us to call Alchem Biotechnology to verify the results-report you posted?
http://www.ajfz.net/lists/1/13.html
We have several chinese-speaking friends who can help.
 
I was mistaken at first by believing the "report" BS
All peak data is completely different

Now look how a Testosterone Enanthate chart was supposed to look (look at peak 4)
according to WATERS the manufacturer of the same machine PPL claims to own, right from the official website
http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/wc6-4-4.pdf
totally different

So we can safely conclude this is a MADE-UP TEST RESULT
EXPOSED ENOUGH?

Not enough?
Do you still want us to call Alchem Biotechnology to verify the results-report you posted?
http://www.ajfz.net/lists/1/13.html
We have several chinese-speaking friends who can help.

I think you should call em

http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/wc6-4-4.pdf
is for a different model unit altogether.
and alchem can prepare a report anyway it wants.

as for the dea docs, I cant read them things, I doubt many people here can. I know that shit is from 2005 and they're using totatally different equiptment and methodology.

maybe millard could call em, he's got experience with this stuff.
 
Who surf's around Dea website anyway I know I don't isn't no damn way I would click you're link.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
I think you should call em

http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/wc6-4-4.pdf
is for a different model unit altogether.
and alchem can prepare a report anyway it wants.

as for the dea docs, I cant read them things, I doubt many people here can. I know that shit is from 2005 and they're using totatally different equiptment and methodology.

maybe millard could call em, he's got experience with this stuff.
UPLC is UPLC so the peaks ain't going to be different among models , perhaps only the sensitivity will change.
What's your interest in whitewashing PPL I ask?
It is a FAKE REPORT period.
 
Yeah, go type pharmacom labs into the YouTube search lol...

I never liked that 24k had Gmail but he did use protonmail also... Gmail was a security risk he got away with.
How much of a red flag is considered when a source advertises on you tube? I am highly intrigued cause I just watched a promo video on YouTube for pharma.
 
Back
Top