Sure
1 The chart is made from WATERS CORPORATION the same company that made the UPLC machine PPL claims to own, PPL even posted pics of it. FACT
Has no bearing on the discussion
2 Waters, the afore mentioned company is a very large and serious one. FACT
Waters Corporation - Wikipedia
Has no bearing on the discussion
3 They are worth 12.52 Billion $
WAT : Summary for Waters Corporation Common Stock - Yahoo Finance
Has no bearing on the discussion
4 Being such a large and serious company, Waters has no interest in illegal steroid sources, and they won't alter any UPLC chart in any way. FACT
Has no bearing on the discussion. Waters did not generate the testing report
5 Waters is not affiliated with
@purplepandalabs in any way. FACT
Has no bearing on the discussion
6 The charts from Waters and from PPL look completely different. FACT
Just to recap the Waters Testosterone Enanthate chart can be found here: see page 2, peak 4
http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/wc6-4-4.pdf
PPL posted his UPLC report here
PurplePandaLabs Raw source
PPL posted pics of his WATERS UPLC machine here:
PurplePandaLabs Raw source
He claims to have more pics of the same UPLC machine in his website
You are comparing a HLPC test to a UPLC test, I'm guessing that matters. You are also looking at a few pages from a Waters product brochure from 20 years ago. My guess would be that product testing has changed a bit since then. If PPLs results were to mimic the test that you have produced one would be inclined to think that the same standards would have to be used in order for the results to end up the same. Do you know the same standards have been used? Do you actually know how to read these charts and what would effect the outcome one way or another and why or are you just trying to pontificate your way to the top of the dirt pile?
7 Since Waters has absolutely no interest in altering charts (FACT), and Ppl MIGHT be interested in altering them (CONDITIONAL CONJECTURE) and the charts look completely different (FACT), then
@purplepandalabs faked the report
LOGICAL CONCLUSION
Sorry for the caps, of course I'm not yelling at you
@Ickyrica but they are crucial to separate facts from conjectures.
I appreciate the facts that you have illustrated but they just dance around obvious things that any one of us could have pointed out, capital letters or not.
@purplepandalabs at this point, being exposed as badly as you are now, if you still want to continue selling gear:
1 Be honest and apologize
2 Get a money back guarantee from your powder suppliers
(ALL sources are resellers, absolutely nothing wrong with that)
3 Send Chemtox AT LEAST one product every month and post results.
4 If results come bad, get money back from supplier as explained in #2
5 Don't even try to forge Chemtox results: we'll find out.
I'm not being harsh despite all the lying, my advice is just
common sense.