Rep Ranges and Science

[Liter O' Test]

I have switched to more sets and reps and find it works extremely well. The way I think of it is, as more muscle fibers get "tired" the ones that don't will work harder. So by going higher reps, I tire out one set of fibers, and by doing more reps the ones that "compensate" get tired. The net result is more total muscle gets worked. The thing I have found is with the increased volume you reach total body fatigue within a few months and need a "deload" week. And obviously I'm on gear, I utilize it to work more days (6 days a week). I could be totally wrong on what is taking place in the muscle but the results have been awesome.

what is high volume for you?

 

[Grey Spartan]

what is high volume for you?

Here is my current workout.

Thread 'Working Mans Split'

Nov 11, 2024

This is the split I do with limited time in the morning before work. It is a super set type workout, working antagonist muscles with only 1-2 min breaks (if any) in between sets.

I have a training partner (my wife) so It makes it easy to utilize two pieces of equipment at the gym.

Example, quads and hamstrings for a super set. If say I go to leg press after the super set, I will take a 1-2 min break between sets (or just go after my training partner is done) and will not do a warm up because it is not needed.

We start a cycle with 4 working sets of 8 - 15 reps then add a set each...

• Grey Spartan
• Replies: 3
• Forum: Training Forum

• 
• 

 

[laclark89]

Hey, thanks for at least taking the time to watch it. Sorry it was a waste of time for you.

I disagree with the second quoted sentence. There are two threads running right now on this forum with "gym bros" mostly saying the precise

Well, I suppose it's about those ideas about reps for strength, reps for hypertrophy being quite set, in people's mind and things actually being a lot more felxible/fluid with regards to what works.
I thought tut was for set, not for session, which is what he says.
I am not sure what your expectations were.

But I think that, in the end, it all boils down to what feels right and works for one, what can be sustainable and effective for you and the type of training you like.
Many ways to skin a cat, as you said earlier.
You brought the example of calisthenics, which I know you have discussed some time ago with a gentleman who did not see eye to eye with you.

I always wanted to reply to that, but wasn't sure you wanted that thread to be bumped. It finished with you writing,

Please reply if you really want , it’s not too old to bump up and get in trouble with the forum they just don’t like bumping really old stuff, and like me and u talked about in the past, even my wife says male gymnasts have the best looking physiques, all they do is calisthenics and a small amount of Olympic style lifting. When you do a pull up and feel light as air is a awesome feeling.

One thing I agree with this pale weak skinny researcher who looks like he just moved to the states from Antarctica who spent his whole life researching to tell people 5-35 reps is optimum is 7 sets of 3 reps that i tried back In the day sucks I actually put time into that stupid program.

Also Kenyans have more type 1 fiber which is a little racist, but no shit they are usto chasing Down game long distance to wear them out. Why they do good in the Olympics.
Tell me I’m wrong and I’ll love it.

Minus Charles glass , flex Lewis advocates the highest reps for weights at 25 reps. Anything over that it’s calisthenics or too light of a weight. Even though first years of foot ball weight lifting they teach u to do body weight squats untill u drop or can’t sit on the toilet.

It was just so vague and so many uncertainty and in theory, like I said it’s individual response. No one but Mike o Hearn does sets of 5 in his old age that I know of. So no shit. But in my little opinion 5-25 is optional not 35.

I wish someone would tag type 11 on this to reaffirm what I’ve said. Then I will bow down and shut my mouth.