It's interesting you say that because that is what I said in the begining for pcom to reimburse the garbage with new stable and clean vials or give refund. ...also, testing is very expensive and the typical test that gets done and posted is one that only shows 2 things... it confirms that the label is matching with at least some portion of the contents in the vial, so they ID it as well as the concentration - dose present in a ml of that particular compound... that's it. It won't test for metals which typically isn't really needed in steroid testing. (I'll have to find the notes from SIMEC responses). Also, that basic test that ranges from 300-600 euros won't show you anything else in that vial without doing a mass spec test which typically runs 5000-10000 euros, ohh and SIMEC doesn't have the equipment to perform mass spec testing... and I highly doubt anyone especially pharmacom forks that out each time one of theirs got tested. And this is why pcom are having a field day and laughing because if those contaminated vials get tested, all it will confirm is that label and compound present matches at this concentration...
So I don't think it's SIMEC wrong doing, but the lab claiming his shit is perfect knowing full well that the mass spec wasn't done to prove what was in those vials and they are supposedly clean! Bull[emoji90]
As for anabolic lab, I think they are safe as they, I assume, send gear that is stable and clear for testing and only need to prove the compound presence and what dose per ml it is and if the label matches.
Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
After further homework, I have found that Luca did indeed pay for heavy metal testing (ICP-OES) and microbial testing (TAMC and TYMC testing). According to the United States Pharmacopia, the USP <61> test , also called the Microbial Enumerations Test, is similar to the aerobic plate count assay and is comprised of both TAMC and TYMC tests. The PURPOSE of the USP <61> test, the one Luca paid for, is to determine if the sample is contaminated with either bacteria or fungus.
I also saw the Simec email you're referring to from the other board you're on. In this email Simec said they didn't have the equipment needed to perform an organic impurity test which is an HPLC-MS. "According to the definition given by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, impurity is any component of a substance for pharmaceutical use that is not the chemical entity defined as the substance." This test doesn't test for microbes but impurities which are two different things.
It seems safe to say that Luca indeed chose the right tests for this situation, Simec does indeed have the capability to test for bacteria and fungus, these tests don't cost 5000+ Euros (the organic impurity test does), and once Luca posts his results we will finally have an answer to this problem once and for all.
I should have added that TAMC stands for Total Aerobic Microbial Count and TYMC stands for Total Yeas and Molds Count.