rus7ee
New Member
in europe we can hope for russia to make big exports through latvia and estonia to eu
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless this election drastically changes the composition of the House and Senate, which polls suggest is increasingly unlikely, then yah it’s basically a guarantee. Have you been paying attention to Congress the last 10-15 years?
It just came out of committee, that means most special interests don’t even care about it yet really. Also it doesn’t even really matter if there is no opposition, as laws get sabotaged after committee before the floor in a myriad of ways even if it has overwhelming support politically and publicly.
I’d take that bet because it’s clear you don’t understand the American legislative system and that literally nothing passes unanimously in the House, and hardly anything unanimously passes the Senate that isn’t national security funding related, and even that’s controversial now. That’s an easy bet.
The bill itself is a hollow set of ideas they want implemented, and the implementation of those ideas will take years of other committees working out how to make this possible. It’s 22 pages (nothing) and lacks almost entirely any details on *how* it will be implemented.
This is fear mongering at this stage. A change may be coming, but it’s not anywhere near as rapid as you’re panicking about.
Text of the bill if anyone’s interested in seeing what’s proposed,
Things are getting strict again
Raws and steroids shortages are expected the next weeks or months.
Some steroid raws products might not be restocked for a while, and it might affect the oils stocks as well.
I advise you to take advantage of current last days of the promo because we don’t plan to redo oils promos for while.
CN police targetting steroid raws factories, many ongoing investigations and potential future busts
ad hominem
There is always a cyclical clampdown on raw manufacturers that wonder outside of the policy of no sales inside China. Couple that with the US elections and China needs to show that at least is trying to control the flow of illegal raws into the intl marketPlausible, could be something else, who knows.
Agree. In the last 4-5 years or so they’ve clamped down at different times for different reasons, eg on the manufacturing of specific raws that have a high intrinsic level of environmental harm (eg primo), targeted finished orals, specific API’s the Chinese authorities don’t like / regard as harmful to health & then the was the issue of distributors getting involved in also selling recreational / street drugs & precursors, eg “The Queen” being busted.There is always a cyclical clampdown on raw manufacturers that wonder outside of the policy of no sales inside China.
How long have you been active on IPED forums?Plausible, could be something else, who knows. When was the last time raws manufacturers were clamped down on? Before my time...
Agree. In the last 4-5 years or so they’ve clamped down at different times for different reasons, eg on the manufacturing of specific raws that have a high intrinsic level of environmental harm (eg primo), targeted finished orals, specific API’s the Chinese authorities don’t like / regard as harmful to health & then the was the issue of distributors getting involved in also selling recreational / street drugs & precursors, eg “The Queen” being busted.
Nothing new here so far & shouldn’t be assumed to be anything worth worrying about.
If anything, members making a song & dance out of this is just likely to encourage some raws sources to exploit forum paranoia & hike up prices big time, just like the likes of Panda et al did about 3 years ago.
I just don't want to see (understandable) typical Meso US-centric OPSEC paranoia in UK threads. It's relevant for US threads, but misplaced & misleading to UK & EU members, particularly newbies.
Neither @narta or I wasn’t talking about that issue, fat-boy.Do you (or your cohort) understand the "shipping line" that's used by every single AAS vendor sending gear to the US?
In short, a container of thousands of small packages declared to all be below the $800 "de minimus" threshold are consolidated, and a manifest specifying the presumptively duty free content is transmitted to customs, and the entire container, in most cases, bypasses customs inspection.
This is the basis of the "golden age" of AAS availability in the US.
Even in the absence of any of the legislation that's certain to pass, the Executive Orders issued in September are sufficient on their own to kill the primary method by which gear gets into the hands of US customers.
Requiring far more specific details on the manifest, and forcing the shipping company to attest that they have affirmatively identified the shipper's identity, will be enough to make anyone trying to send packs of AAS to the US persona non grata. Several vendors here have already been banned from using shippers, causing delays, and that's in a very permissive environment, not one that threatens millions of dollars of losses for each incident of contraband that "slips through" and gets into a container.
No multi-billion shipping company can afford being suspended from participating in expedited clearance for 90 days because a random inspection finds even a single package of contraband, whose contents are fraudulently declared obviously, in a random inspection. Only trusted shippers will be able to get their packs into containers once that takes effect. The Chinese will conduct their own inspections given what's at stake.
Customs literally gave 6 major Chinese shippers a small taste of the amount of economic pain just such a suspension can inflect a few months ago, over minor discrepancies on manifests of these small packages.
Once the new rules go into effect, no shipping company will stick their neck out for packs coming from any but the most above board companies . Small companies, or anyone they have any doubts of will have their packages sequestered, separated from the container, and handed off to customs for manual clearance. "We're not vouching for these" will be the policy.
This is a US centric issue, which I wouldn't expect you to have any familiarity with.
There is no parallel in the UK.
Notice in the title I specified (US). That was aimed at you.
I don't want to see your myopic, Guardian reader, leftist understanding of US policy to inform the decision making of those who, unlike you, will be on the receiving end of its consequences.
Any idea that a few American members here should avoid "stocking up" as an insurance policy in light of very real threats of a significant supply interruption, because it will drive up the prices you pay speaks to how little the typical Brit street Marxist understands markets. There are numerous suppliers here. They don't act in unison. There is not a "Commission of AAS dealers" fixing prices. If one raises another cutthroat Chinese merchant will be happy to take the business of a customer driven away by that gouging.
And as I keep emphasizing, the downside of modestly stocking up and it turning out to be unnecessary is minimal, but to be caught unaware, left high and dry for months, or longer, running out of much needed supplies could be dire in some cases.
And what would you say then? "Oh well, sorry."?
Ghoul,Do you (or your cohort) understand the "shipping line" that's used by every single AAS vendor sending gear to the US?
In short, a container of thousands of small packages declared to all be below the $800 "de minimus" threshold are consolidated, and a manifest specifying the presumptively duty free content is transmitted to customs, and the entire container, in most cases, bypasses customs inspection.
This is the basis of the "golden age" of AAS availability in the US.
Even in the absence of any of the legislation that's certain to pass, the Executive Orders issued in September are sufficient on their own to kill the primary method by which gear gets into the hands of US customers.
Requiring far more specific details on the manifest, and forcing the shipping company to attest that they have affirmatively identified the shipper's identity, will be enough to make anyone trying to send packs of AAS to the US persona non grata. Several vendors here have already been banned from using shippers, causing delays, and that's in a very permissive environment, not one that threatens millions of dollars of losses for each incident of contraband that "slips through" and gets into a container.
No multi-billion shipping company can afford being suspended from participating in expedited clearance for 90 days because a random inspection finds even a single package of contraband, whose contents are fraudulently declared obviously, in a random inspection. Only trusted shippers will be able to get their packs into containers once that takes effect. The Chinese will conduct their own inspections given what's at stake.
Customs literally gave 6 major Chinese shippers a small taste of the amount of economic pain just such a suspension can inflect a few months ago, over minor discrepancies on manifests of these small packages.
Once the new rules go into effect, no shipping company will stick their neck out for packs coming from any but the most above board companies . Small companies, or anyone they have any doubts of will have their packages sequestered, separated from the container, and handed off to customs for manual clearance. "We're not vouching for these" will be the policy.
This is a US centric issue, which I wouldn't expect you to have any familiarity with.
There is no parallel in the UK.
Notice in the title I specified (US). That was aimed at you.
I don't want to see your myopic, Guardian reader, leftist understanding of US policy to inform the decision making of those who, unlike you, will be on the receiving end of its consequences.
Any idea that a few American members here should avoid "stocking up" as an insurance policy in light of very real threats of a significant supply interruption, because it will drive up the prices you pay speaks to how little the typical Brit street Marxist understands markets. There are numerous suppliers here. They don't act in unison. There is not a "Commission of AAS dealers" fixing prices. If one raises another cutthroat Chinese merchant will be happy to take the business of a customer driven away by that gouging.
And as I keep emphasizing, the downside of modestly stocking up and it turning out to be unnecessary is minimal, but to be caught unaware, left high and dry for months, or longer, running out of much needed supplies could be dire in some cases.
And what would you say then? "Oh well, sorry."?
Leaving it open ended leaves him a chance to be right.Care to put a date on this? Predictions like this are kinda worthless otherwise.
This Friday, next Friday, November 2025, 2027, etc.
I predict 2029, feb. 29th.Care to put a date on this? Predictions like this are kinda worthless otherwise.
This Friday, next Friday, November 2025, 2027, etc.
Leaving it open ended leaves him a chance to be right.
Is a millions dollars business worldwide. They will find a way to produce, export and import the raws.
A business like this will simple not die but it will reinvent the method to get things done.
In China is the same guy that have power for the last 20 years or so. If he wanted to do something about this it would have done but the most that is happening is a bit of noise before the Olympics or before a big event and then back to normal.
At the end of 2019 was again the info that raws will get banned and 5 years later I can buy kilos without a issue. Same shit different day now.
India produce some raws if China will have some temporary trouble to provide.
Also I have seen on YouTube a documentary about fentanyl and now it's produced in Mexico by cartels. Don't know how true is that tho.