ANONYMOUS_ANABOLICS

What’s the reasoning for you guys wanting so many blends? Never made sense to me; you’re fixing your ratios and making it impossible to up or drop any individual compound alone.
I agree with what you are saying here. For instance, the 3 Cyp blend would be great, but for me, I never go above 250mg of Test per week...so that particular blend, though its awesome, would be less appealing to me than some others. The Tren/Mast blend on the other hand is right up my alley. I usually run Tren and Mast at a 1:1 ratio anyways(100-150mg eod). Also what someone could do in that case, is run a long ester behind the blend of whatever compound you wanted to be higher dosed. Blends aren't for everyone, and I see what you mean.
 
I agree with what you are saying here. For instance, the 3 Cyp blend would be great, but for me, I never go above 250mg of Test per week...so that particular blend, though its awesome, would be less appealing to me than some others. The Tren/Mast blend on the other hand is right up my alley. I usually run Tren and Mast at a 1:1 ratio anyways(100-150mg eod). Also what someone could do in that case, is run a long ester behind the blend of whatever compound you wanted to be higher dosed. Blends aren't for everyone, and I see what you mean.
I guess, aside from dosing, it just seems like a slippery slope for @Anonymous_anabolics; endless blends could be requested and this thread turns into a debate on blend dosing.
 
So the bloods I had scheduled for December... Turns out those are actually scheduled for November. Will keep y'all posted. Been running AA TestC for several weeks now.
 
I agree and have always dismissed blends but that test nand bold sounds great. I'd just do like 2cc a week of that and fill in as needed with single compounds
That is probably the nicest blend I’ve seen yoire right. But it is heavy per CC.
 
Oh yeah, just realized it's 600/ml

That brings up another reason I have always dismissed blends. I've never trusted the doses are right!
Actually, I've seen a lot of sources test ok, the problem I've had with them is that they usually hurt. I Did run another sources mast p and mast e blend that I liked though
 
Actually, I've seen a lot of sources test ok, the problem I've had with them is that they usually hurt. I Did run another sources mast p and mast e blend that I liked though
I can handle the pain It just would be so easy to label 200 200 200 and actually have 100 100 100 and charge like it's the first one
 
Not shitting on this Thread, but I question a lot of Primo also. I know of several sources that charge like 100-110. And then you got some that are like 60 or even less. How is that possible? Never ran it for this reason
 
Not shitting on this Thread, but I question a lot of Primo also. I know of several sources that charge like 100-110. And then you got some that are like 60 or even less. How is that possible? Never ran it for this reason
Same, if I try it I'll try the amps

AND when was the last time you saw any kind of primo testing, I haven't seen many
 
Not shitting on this Thread, but I question a lot of Primo also. I know of several sources that charge like 100-110. And then you got some that are like 60 or even less. How is that possible? Never ran it for this reason
Yep. You’re better off going with European sources for that IMO. It should be pricey as fuck to run unfortunately (cost and mgs needed for effect).
 
Back
Top