Are ampuoles or vials safer

Assuming both are manufactured to the same standards of brew, both are handled by the user properly & both sterile -

Theoretically an ample should be “safer” since it’s a sterile one time use. The multi use vial could technically grow bacteria.

In practicality both are “safe” as long as they’re manufactured correctly.
 
Assuming both are manufactured to the same standards of brew, both are handled by the user properly & both sterile -

Theoretically an ample should be “safer” since it’s a sterile one time use. The multi use vial could technically grow bacteria.

In practicality both are “safe” as long as they’re manufactured correctly.
100% correct and amples are more sterile for sure.
 
For example HCG pharma, the same house do different vials size or ampoules size or dosage and even the number of ampoules in a box. Imho it’s all about easiness of use for the end user, avoiding doing math, imagine elderly people.
Of course in ampoules it’s more sterile they don’t use benzoyl alcohol or other, in fact officially if you use 1ml of a 2ml ampule, you’re supposed to throw the rest in the garbage.
And about glass shards, they are in the order of picometers so it’s so small that it’s being sucked by the syringe, tho it’s not causing that much of an issue i guess if nobody notices…
 
People would rather shoot microscopic glass than spend the 50 cents on a filter needle? The reason they overfill amps is to accommodate the filtration not to give you free test.

Also, backfilling another syringe with the leftover test is retarded because amps don't have BA/BB to prevent it from going rancid. Why is use as directed so hard for people?
 
Should you buy ampuoles or vials?

In my YouTube research I've heard a few times now that ampuoles are much safer than vials. In that they don't or very rarely have contamination. That vials are more readily available because theyre cheaper and quicker to make. Making them prone to being contaminated. Also cutting corners could also be an issue.

My understanding is getting contaminats can be real nasty and sidelined form months. And no one wants that.

Finding a distributor isn't an issue. But finding one with ampuoles is. So what say you. Are vials or ampuoles safer and is there really a difference?
Strictly speaking you should never, even after millions of injections, have any issue with either as the cause of infection or abscess.

Multi-use vials do require a couple seconds prep to wipe the lid with an alcohol swab and keep dry, but leaving the remainder of especially water-based suspension in ampoules can cause issues actually more readily than the vials. Aqueous suspension being sold in ampoules has actually become more common lately, especially as 100 mg/mL which is a lot for one pin.

Temu used to sell plastic ampoule stoppers for storing the remainder in somewhere like a fridge.

Practically, you might just put the remainder of an ampoule in an old generic GH kit and keep it in a dry place.
 
What exactly are you objecting to, with regards to what Zebedee wrote?

You don't make any sense.
He didnt have a problem with not filtering 2000 amps?

There are studies with close up of shards in breaked amps.

Did i understand wrongly?
 
He didnt have a problem with not filtering 2000 amps?

Here.
This OP'S QUESTION:

that ampuoles are much safer than vials. In that they don't or very rarely have contamination.

CONTAMINATION.


you write studies and Ghoul.
here is Ghoul, using amps without filtering for glass:
Although I've used many without, you are supposed to use a filter syringe to draw to stop tiny shards of glass.

And this is what you disliked with thumbs down .
Answering OP'S question:

I’ve used probably over 2,000 amps over the years & I’ve never had any issues with this.

Then adding, with regards to what the actual is risks may consist of
Personally you’re far more likely to inject foreign bodies (be they glass, rubber from stoppers or random “stuff”) from UGL vials & also from most supposedly “sterile” generic vials bought for homebrewing.
 
Here.
This OP'S QUESTION:



CONTAMINATION.


you write studies and Ghoul.
here is Ghoul, using amps without filtering for glass:


And this is what you disliked with thumbs down .
Answering OP'S question:



Then adding, with regards to what the actual is risks may consist of
Still dont understand xd
Every amp pharma or not has glass contamination 100%.

And who cares if ghoul used them before? He knows now.

Really confused at the moment.

"Personally you’re far more likely to inject foreign bodies (be they glass, rubber from stoppers or random “stuff”) from UGL vials & also from most supposedly “sterile” generic vials bought for homebrewing. "

So your 100% injecting contamination from amps and he is saying your injecting more contamination?
 
Last edited:
Smart to stop typing, props for that ;)

Ps: why dislike brother? Just want to clear my confusion. Then can you explain? I cant have dislikes man :(
 
Last edited:
Back
Top