Whatever...
And how this ties into a "war on men", I dont know.
But it is assumed that men are the culprets...
What do you tell a woman with two black eyes?
Nothing - YOU ALREADY TOLD HER TWICE... LOL[
)]:drooling:
I would like to point out that IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO. I dont know the details either. But also everyone should consider that we live in a society where domestic violence is a HOT TOPIC these days. Its always occurred. I live in an area where they have been capitalizing on this. If the cops come to your house for anything quarrel related - ONE OF YOU IS GOING TO JAIL. This is $$ for the system. Period. But there ain no sending one to the friends house or hotel round here. There is also just too much experience with the involved going right back over and starting up the shit again on the same drunken night...!
As far as I am concerned - RACING IS RUBBING. If she wants a good poppin - then give her one, and no one should have the authority to say whos wrong. There is a differnce between a stranger barging into your house or slappin you on the street. A woman is involved with a man from the get go. She knows what he likes and dislikes. Just like she likes the door opened for her, and she knows how to act to have that happen. She also knows how to start a fight. She also has experience with how he will respond in given instances. Essentially, SHE KNOWS WHAT SHE IS DOING. And I dont give a fuck if he just came home from work one day, had some drinks and slapped her ass. BECAUSE HE WOULD NOT HAVE DONE IT IF SHE HAD NOT DONE SOMETHIING TO HURT HIM LEADING UP.!!! She knew what he would do and evoked it. She did not get with him because he is a pussy? right? Did this wife or girlfriend marry, start living with him, or invite him in because she thought he had no respect for her.?!?
Point - there needs to be more legal qualification for domestic involvment. So here are the new rules...[
)]
:
1. If two people are co-habitating and qualify by set standards, then what goes on in the home, stays in the home.
2. Short of gross violence qualified by broken bones, cuts, or bullet wounds - there is no foul.
3. Pistol whipping is ok as long as it meets the above criteria and there is no deadly intent. Choking is optional but preferred. As long as recessitated upon accidental death - No foul...
4. The matter should be confined to PUBLIC INTERACTION ONLY.
She got involved with him cause she liked him. What changed? And why would she become a person that causes the person that SHE qualified for a mate to cahnge no negatively?! She has the option to leave. She had the option NOT TO FUCK IT UP... Social standards are so backwards and fucked up today. Women are many times simply fucking spoiled brat children and abusing a system that has been perverted over the years by liberal, ignorant idiots, who are manipulating the loud noise of the SMALL VOICE and thus perverting our society into PUSSYVILLE. I pray to the above the some standard sense of moral right and wrong shall continue to prevail to at least whatever extend it remains.
So really I guess it is sort of a "war on men", but more like a BATTLE in the WAR OF SOCIAL INSANITY that is the United States today.
This may not completely qualify for the particular circumstance of Crisler, but felt good. LOL
