Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[Mike Hunt]

Sumone let me no if im wrong i red the whole thread

 

[janoshik]

Jano,
"quality of the results" does not seem to fit your M.O. at this point. Its one thing to hear this from @mands and @Dr JIM, but Darius would not use you and proved out right your testing is off.
I am being respectful as I can here (which is not usually my trait), but you have to give up the ghost because you have been shamed.

But quality of the results does fit my M.O.

This is an echo box where people repeat the same stuff all over and over again, trying to make it not seem like that, but it's a fact that I don't really make more mistakes than other laboratories and unlike most I have actual control mechanisms.

Karius, handled it like a man, told me about the issue (although later than I'd like and not by direct confrontation), I offered immediate refund and talked with him about sorting it out and determining where the issue lies/lied. I didn't try to excuse myself out of that issue.

Between then and now I received massive amounts of samples and the issue never presented again. So however unfortunate it is, it was an isolated incident indeed.

---


On the other hand @mands and jim still refuse to openly admit the fact that all their testing was a fuck up, even though mands hesitantly points to knowing it was so. But he's still not a man enough to simply state it like a man. JIM is straight out lying for years babbling about 'gold standard ' with mands still refusing to call him out being a fraud and not a doctor at all.

 

[janoshik]

Yes and it means making like a light and going away quietly.

What's funny, I probably would be gone by now if I didn't see how much I'm pissing Mands by doing my job well and making my customers satisfied, so I thoroughly enjoy that.

It's like getting the compensation for my services twice.

Don't you see how he didn't mind me for over a year at all, until people started using me? He started fuming right then.

 

[master.on]

But quality of the results does fit my M.O.

This is an echo box where people repeat the same stuff all over and over again, trying to make it not seem like that, but it's a fact that I don't really make more mistakes than other laboratories and unlike most I have actual control mechanisms.

Karius, handled it like a man, told me about the issue (although later than I'd like and not by direct confrontation), I offered immediate refund and talked with him about sorting it out and determining where the issue lies/lied. I didn't try to excuse myself out of that issue.

Between then and now I received massive amounts of samples and the issue never presented again. So however unfortunate it is, it was an isolated incident indeed.

---


On the other hand @mands and jim still refuse to openly admit the fact that all their testing was a fuck up, even though mands hesitantly points to knowing it was so. But he's still not a man enough to simply state it like a man. JIM is straight out lying for years babbling about 'gold standard ' with mands still refusing to call him out being a fraud and not a doctor at all.

---

Thank you for sober message - as you can see, I treat as I'm treated.

What's funny, I probably would be gone by now if I didn't see how much I'm pissing Mands by doing my job well and making my customers satisfied, so I thoroughly enjoy that.

It's like getting the compensation for my services twice.

Don't you see how he didn't mind me for over a year at all, until people started using me? He started fuming right then.

So you have countless hours to bullshit on several steroid boards.
That doesn't sound like a chromatographer. They're always busy

You don't test shit
You just make up numbers

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Sumone let me no if im wrong i red the whole thread

Then form a conclusion based on what you've read.

 

[Dr JIM]

Jano,
"quality of the results" does not seem to fit your M.O. at this point. Its one thing to hear this from @mands and @Dr JIM, but Darius would not use you and proved out right your testing is off.
I am being respectful as I can here (which is not usually my trait), but you have to give up the ghost because you have been shamed.

Jano has used lab speak rhetoric and esoteric rebuttals for YEARS to convince members he knows his way around an anaytical lab.

And the proof he’s scamming folk lies in his failure to follow the analytical standard and post procedural, graphic and narrative data with any of his assays.

The fact is NONE of Janos assays complied or are even remotely consistent w the certified US analytical
lab results @mands and I posted on Meso some time ago on Generic GH.

JIM

 

[MindlessWork]

Jano has used lab speak rhetoric and esoteric rebuttals for YEARS to convince members he knows his way around an anaytical lab.

And the proof he’s scamming folk lies in his failure to follow the analytical standard and post procedural, graphic and narrative data with any of his assays.

The fact is NONE of Janos assays complied or are even remotely consistent w the certified US analytical
lab results @mands and I posted on Meso some time ago on Generic GH.

JIM

I smh at Jano calling you fake so he is low IQ IMO.

 

[Steve84]

Remember Jano only has to make up a purity/concentration number as he asks what steroid is in it.

Unlike Simec/Lab4tox he never ever spotted another steroid in samples i.e. sold as "deca" but being actually Testosterone.




Everyone knows those "satisfied customers" on Anasci is actually you with alternate handles.





Yep move on out
or you'll be escorted to the door, club bouncers style.




He doesn't test anything
Jano only makes up numbers.
Chromatography is really time consuming. No way he can bitch all day in several boards, and still have time to test gear.

What's odd is a source uses him for raws.
All except 1 come back 98-99% pure. The 1 raw that did come back at 91% also had a finished product about 10% low (product testing done by someone else). Yet other products were on point with 98-99% pure raws.

While I see the point. I actually don't see how he could've picked the 1 blind raw out of 5 that was low. That lined up with a finished product result.

All of this is pretty fucked up.
It's hard to know who to believe as you don't sell yourself intelligent either.

 

[Dr JIM]

I smh at Jano calling you fake so he is low IQ IMO.

Just another form of deflection, or detour Jano has used for YEARS to distract members from the
real issue, his huge credibility void.

And each day that void gets bigger and bigger, and proves the clown is classless

Jim

 

[janoshik]

I smh at Jano calling you fake so he is low IQ IMO.

An insult on my intelligence coming from a guy like you...

Maybe you could try asking Mands.
He should be able to answer a simple yes/no question.

Hey @mands is Jim a real doctor or has he been lying and bullshitting everybody here for years?

 

[janoshik]

Just another form of deflection, or detour Jano has used for YEARS to distract members from the
real issue, his huge credibility void.

And each day that void gets bigger and bigger, and proves the clown is classless

Jim

Even your friend @mands is not defending you anymore, he's just keeping quiet, deflecting and disassociating himself from you because you are not only a fraud, you are too stupid to achieve anything.

You are a joke to anybody, but the most naive, even though you spend half you waking time parroting random repetitive bits of knowledge you learned over the years and stuff you googled over here on this forum.

Just like you are a joke to anybody in real life.

 

[janoshik]

What's odd is a source uses him for raws.
All except 1 come back 98-99% pure. The 1 raw that did come back at 91% also had a finished product about 10% low (product testing done by someone else). Yet other products were on point with 98-99% pure raws.

While I see the point. I actually don't see how he could've picked the 1 blind raw out of 5 that was low. That lined up with a finished product result.

All of this is pretty fucked up.
It's hard to know who to believe as you don't sell yourself intelligent either.

Any reaction to master.on is a wasted one.
It's like trying to explain something to a scrap metal cyborg.

Thank you for posting your experience/observation.

 

[movingiron88]

Even your friend @mands is not defending you anymore, he's just keeping quiet, deflecting and disassociating himself from you because you are not only a fraud, you are too stupid to achieve anything.

You are a joke to anybody, but the most naive, even though you spend half you waking time parroting random repetitive bits of knowledge you learned over the years and stuff you googled over here on this forum.

Just like you are a joke to anybody in real life.

Haha isn't that the pot calling the kettle black. You have no right to imply anyone is a fraud due to your proven track record.

It's over case closed, you cannot be trusted and your service holds zero weight.

Dont you have testing to do? Seem to spend an awful lot of time on here if you actually performed any testing whatsoever.

Man, you have invested so much time and money into this fraudulent business venture. It has to hurt that it burnt down in flames.

Now go crawl back into your cave in that third world country you live in.

 

[master.on]

Newbies
Don't ever use Jano "testing services" as he just makes up numbers and doesn't actually test anything.

 

[Mike Hunt]

Newbies
Don't ever use Jano "testing services" as he just makes up numbers and doesn't actually test anything.

Thanks thats wat it is looking like 2 me

 

[PrinceLambo]

What's odd is a source uses him for raws.
All except 1 come back 98-99% pure. The 1 raw that did come back at 91% also had a finished product about 10% low (product testing done by someone else). Yet other products were on point with 98-99% pure raws.

While I see the point. I actually don't see how he could've picked the 1 blind raw out of 5 that was low. That lined up with a finished product result.

All of this is pretty fucked up.
It's hard to know who to believe as you don't sell yourself intelligent either.

Not picking sides, but are all the nay-sayers just gonna ignore this post?

 

[lightspan]

Not picking sides, but are all the nay-sayers just gonna ignore this post?

I addressed this. He may have performed 100’s of legit analyses. The problem is - he has come up short (see screencaps from AB in this thread) on at least one AAS test and freely admitted to faking a gh test. So you don’t know when he’s going to decide to say fuck it and fake a test.

 

[master.on]

I addressed this. He may have performed 100’s of legit analyses. The problem is - he has come up short (see screencaps from AB in this thread) on at least one AAS test and freely admitted to faking a gh test. So you don’t know when he’s going to decide to say fuck it and fake a test.

The problem is that those "satisfied customers" are either:
A. Shills
B. Himself
C. Sources known to pay him to make up 98-99% purity figures.

He doesn't test anything
He doesn't have any lab equipment
He makes up everything

 

[Den84]

The problem is that those "satisfied customers" are either:
A. Shills
B. Himself
C. Sources known to pay him to make up 98-99% purity figures.

He doesn't test anything
He doesn't have any lab equipment

unfortunately, you do not have any evidence to show at the forum. no one can believe you, if you do not show evidence to support what you say. The one thing we all know about is what happened to mands. but after bad experience of mands, jano has been tested many times, by serious users of this forum. blind samples were sent, often the same samples were tested by jano and then by another laboratory. no discrepancies were found in the test results.

so your words are completely rubbish, dear master.on

 

[movingiron88]

unfortunately, you do not have any evidence to show at the forum. no one can believe you, if you do not show evidence to support what you say. The one thing we all know about is what happened to mands. but after bad experience of mands, jano has been tested many times, by serious users of this forum. blind samples were sent, often the same samples were tested by jano and then by another laboratory. no discrepancies were found in the test results.

so your words are completely rubbish, dear master.on

Wrong, look back st the screenshots I posted or go to AB board. Blind samples did not match samples sent to an accredited lab. So yes there are big discrepancies.