Janoshik Analytical laboratory testing services

[Heavy Iron]

You have been reported for breaking an actual, not made up rule.

View attachment 102227

Hopefully @Millard will take it personally and act as swiftly with banning you as he does on other occasions when rules are broken.

I'm not having much hope, but there is some.

Farewell, lying cripple.

But... Did you engage in deceptive activities and fraud with the GH testing for @mands . Like why would you type that in a post report. When all @CensoredBoardsSuck did was say words. He didn't take money, fake a test, lie about it, and then admit. Those are actions. Words are.....well just words. Tagging Millard is ridiculous.

 

[janoshik]

But... Did you engage in deceptive activities and fraud with the GH testing for @mands . Like why would you type that in a post report. When all @CensoredBoardsSuck did was say words. He didn't take money, fake a test, lie about it, and then admit. Those are actions. Words are.....well just words. Tagging Millard is ridiculous.

Where did I post the said GH testing on the forum?
Is there a report with my signature from that test posted anywhere on this forum?
Do you imply I ever took money for that test and that the test report was ever produced? If so, you have been brainwashed and you should think about that.

CBS, blissfully unaware how ignore function works, modified the HTML of a page so it appears modified for his printscreen, in order to get a user banned by his twisted logic. That's direct attempt to fraud Millard with aim to get me banned.

Clear enough now?

IMO it would be equivalent to me photoshopping a private message from you where you solicit me gear and post it here.
Would you find that OK?

(And would Millard find out? Yes, exactly like he would in this case.)

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Where did I post the said GH testing on the forum?
Is there a report with my signature from that test posted anywhere on this forum?
Do you imply I ever took money for that test and that the test report was ever produced? If so, you have been brainwashed and you should think about that.

CBS, blissfully unaware how ignore function works, modified the HTML of a page so it appears modified for his printscreen, in order to get a user banned by his twisted logic. That's direct attempt to fraud Millard with aim to get me banned.

Clear enough now?

IMO it would be equivalent to me photoshopping a private message from you where you solicit me gear and post it here.
Would you find that OK?

(And would Millard find out? Yes, exactly like he would in this case.)

You didn't provide a report, you gave Mands fake numbers.
Regardless, you lied. But everyone knows this already. Why are we still talking about this? Why am i even in this fucking thread? i'm unsubscribing. You guys are giving me a tumor.

 

[Heavy Iron]

If so, you have been brainwashed and you should think about that.

So, here's the story of Jano and my experience with him. I was contemplation not going this route AND handle it privately BUT, now he's trying to insult my intelligence by giving me some bull crap story. I will share with you.

I sent Jano three samples of GH (TP's black TOP meditrope batch #17) for testing. The reason we/he wanted to check his testing with the current AAA testing that myself and @Dr JIM are using. Of course our testing isn't any good by Jano's standard and a few others from PM.

So, I got a private message from Jano that my package was stuck in customs and asked if I used my real address. I skated around the question and told him it was not my address. He said no worries he could get it out of customs no problem and he would test it.

I was supposed to tell him when I received the testing back from our lab to compare to his. Here is our convo on that...

1. janoActive Member
   Hello Mr. Mands.
   
   I just checked and the package seem to have been stopped by customs.
   
   Would you please describe the package completely to me please? So I can decide if I should try picking it up, or if it's too big a risk.
   
   I apologise for the trouble.
   
   jano, Oct 23, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
2. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   EDITED TOO MUCH INFO. Took out some product and placed 3 vials in there wrapped up.
   
   mands
   
   mands, Oct 24, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
3. 
   janoActive Member
   Were the vials marked in any way except the batch # ?
   
   jano, Oct 24, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
4. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   Nope only batch#
   
   mands
   
   mands, Oct 24, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
5. 
   janoActive Member
   Thank you, I'll try to pick them up tomorrow.
   
   jano, Oct 24, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
6. 
   janoActive Member
   Hello Mr. Mands,
   regarding the return address - did you provide your real address?
   
   jano, Oct 25, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
7. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   I provided a real address but not my home.
   
   mands
   
   mands, Oct 25, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
8. 
   janoActive Member
   Good, they had the address noted down, for some reason, just thought I'd warn you.
   
   Give or take a few hours and I'll be ready
   
   jano, Oct 25, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
9. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   Okay! Noted where?
   
   mands
   
   mands, Oct 25, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
10. 
    janoActive Member
    "Contact sender for more informaiton" at the customs.
    
    They only gave it to me, because I am registered lab, but I might suffering some consequences due to the samples being found out.
    
    The stealth was good, it was just a bad coincidence
    
    jano, Oct 25, 2016Report
    Reply

Okay so a little more back in forth messaging and then he reaches out to me asking if I had any info back(news)...

any news?
Mark as UnreadStar ConversationLeave Conversation

1. 
   janoActive Member
   thanks
   
   - jano
   
   jano, Nov 19, 2016Report
   Reply
   
   
2. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   Okay I'm ready when you are. How did those Black tops turn out for you.
   
   mands
   
   mands, Nov 22, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
3. 
   janoActive Member
   I tested #17 three times:
   
   5.2mg was the average result.
   
   A vial from your kit was 5.27mg
   
   So it seems that you consistently get lower results than me and I am very confident in my results.
   
   jano, Nov 22, 2016Report
   Reply

Here is when it gets good...

Yesterday I get a call from my GF and she says did you get something for Christmas from the Czech Republic. I told her to leave it at the door.

I get home and take a look at it and wow I open it and look inside to my amazement the package and (3) gh vials #17 were in the pack. right where I put them. Wrapped up in a two band aids I put them in with all the contents that were in the package I sent.

So, I contact one person by phone this morning from MESO(that I trust). Then I get on encrypted message and talk to two other members from PM and MESO. I told one straight out and mentioned to the other but didn't really give his name. I contacted for their opinion on the matter.

I highly doubt they PM members told him. But, I did get a PM from him stating this...

PM below...

1. mands, Oct 25, 2016EditReport
   Reply
   
   
2. 
   janoActive Member
   Well well well.
   
   Seems like my lack of communication led you to believe I did lie to you, as you've suggested I am a liar in the thread. I apologize for that and I think it had been pointed out because the package seems to have bounced back to you just now.
   
   If that's not the case, please, don't feel like having to read any further - though it will not hurt.
   
   As I have let you know two months ago already, the customs had expressed great interest about the package and gave me trouble regarding it both before and after I got it.
   
   A few days later, before I got to the analysis or opening the package at all, they called me while I was away about either charging me with importing faked medicine or gave me the option to return the package intact to the sender.
   
   I had my gf switch one of the vials with one of the spare vials of #17 I had acquired previously for different test and had her carry the package to the customs office to have it shipped back. The customs had pictures of the contents of the package, so it had to be returned 'whole'.
   
   As I asked you previously if that was your address and you negated it, I simply assumed the pack would bounce and get trashed, so I didn't bother with explaining all this - which seems now like a mistake on my side.
   
   To be honest, I though I mentioned that to you, but it seems I talked about that with somebody else or misremembered it completely, as it's not in our message history, so I was wrong.
   
   Had I not checked the state of the package after I had read your passively agressive post in the thread, this could've been left unexplained and I would hate that.
   
   Please, next time, if there is one, confront me directly out in the open, even if it will make me look like an idiot - it's better to look like one than to leave stuff like this unexplained.
   
   With best regards,
   janoshik
   
   jano, Today at 12:49 PMReport
   Reply
   
   
3. 
   janoActive Member
   I still stand past my results, as always.
   
   jano, Today at 12:52 PMReport
   Reply
   
   
4. 
   mandsWell-Known MemberAnabolicLab.com Supporter
   I didn't threaten you in the open. You assumed it was you cause you lied about testing my vials or one of the two persons I told from PM told you already. I will handle that next.
   
   mands
   
   mands, 48 minutes agoEditReport
   Reply

My questions if I even wanted an answer would be these:

1. Why would you be adamant about what address I used(fake or real)? I know why... That was you could tell me you tested my vials and get away with it if customs wasn't sending it back to a real address.
2. Why would you take the package back down to customs after being called to return it? Just tell them you tossed it. Oh but you were out of town and GF took it. If they threatened you with arrest why would they give it to you in the first place. lol
3. Why would you not tell me this story about customs or your gf switching vials with one of mine? Pretty important info I would think. And you were PM'ing me EOD at least at one point so it's not like we weren't in communication.
4. Why not take all three vials out and replace them with three from your stash if you wanted to test all three vials? I know because it didn't happen. My original band aids holding the vials together were still in there along will all of my other components.

This one bothers me as well...
"As I asked you previously if that was your address and you negated it, I simply assumed the pack would bounce and get trashed, so I didn't bother with explaining all this - which seems now like a mistake on my side.

To be honest, I though I mentioned that to you, but it seems I talked about that with somebody else or misremembered it completely, as it's not in our message history, so I was wrong."
You state that you thought it would get trashed so you didn't bother explaining it. BUT, to be honest you thought you did mention it. lol So you mentioned to somebody you are getting packages from me? WTF. Oh wait you now maybe "misremembered" it completely hahahahaha.

So many more but at this point anything you say will not change my mind on what has transpired here.

Sorry so long.

mands

This is what I was referring to.

I'm with @MisterSuperGod . I'm out. Not my fight. Peace.

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

Oh, talking trash about a member who is blocked is a violation? Is that bannable because that’s exactly what that asswipe 2dumb/PPLrep has done with me.

It is on all social media sites I've been on. The reason for having a block function is so you don't have to listen to me, not give you the freedom to spread rumors and talk shit about me when I can't even defend myself.

When you block, it's implied that you won't misuse it to attack the person you blocked. Doing that is cowardly and despicable.

 

[janoshik]

Why are we still talking about this?

Because they always pull it out when they want to slide a thread. Easy.

 

[T-Bagger]

You didn't provide a report, you gave Mands fake numbers.
Regardless, you lied. But everyone knows this already. Why are we still talking about this? Why am i even in this fucking thread? i'm unsubscribing. You guys are giving me a tumor.

 

[master.on]

I told you once maybe a year ago stop throwing the equipment names you saw somewhere on internet and trying to be smart.

you do not know the difference and what for type of analysis you need it for.

Jano why don't you post picture of your equipment. Didn't you have Agilent 1050 detector ? It was a while ago, 2-3 years ago I cannot remember.

You must be using ChemStation or maybe Clarity. Actually I worked on both. On ChemStation it goes from red to green on one screen showing that the computer is communicating with the equipment, you cannot fake it.

Go to configuration setup do a screen print. You cannot fake it. The configuration setup has to match your equipment on the picture.

So you do not have claims that you do not have equipment.

I'm actually using a different brand now, so I can't do that

But I can send a picture of a sample with a machine turned on with a timestamped piece of paper within 5 minutes of you asking. Ought to be enough.

I see that you have older Shimadzu. It discredits any stupid fucker claiming that you do not have equipment.

Well @master.on, they provided proof of equipment...

Actually, only @mercury posted an equipment pic

Just look at the pic @janoshik posted here

and you'll see that it says
Hello Meso
@mercury 7:22 PM
https://thinksteroids.com/community...sting-services.134392511/page-22#post-2308078

So Jano is pretending to make believe it's his own equipment, when it actually belongs to mercury.
Newbies don't fall for Janoshik scam.

 

[Heavy Iron]

Just look at the pic @janoshik posted here

Lol he was "tagging" Mercury in handwriting ya goon. In response to Mercury asking for a pic.

 

[T-Bagger]

Actually, only @mercury posted an equipment pic

Just look at the pic @janoshik posted here

and you'll see that it says
Hello Meso
@mercury 7:22 PM
https://thinksteroids.com/community...sting-services.134392511/page-22#post-2308078

So Jano is pretending to make believe it's his own equipment, when it actually belongs to mercury.
Newbies don't fall for Janoshik scam.

Sorry dude... Jano took the pic. The handwriting is completely different between the Mercury pic and the Jano pic.

 

[MindlessWork]

Sorry dude... Jano took the pic. The handwriting is completely different between the Mercury pic and the Jano pic.

Good eye!

 

[T-Bagger]

Good eye!

I have learned the secrets of Meso

 

[Millard]

Unblocking long enough to take a screenshot doesn't prove you haven't blocked me, but my screenshot proves you did. Talking shit about someone behind a block isn't just cowardly, it is a violation of the rules. Another fail.

You have been reported for breaking an actual, not made up rule.

View attachment 102227

Hopefully @Millard will take it personally and act as swiftly with banning you as he does on other occasions when rules are broken.

I'm not having much hope, but there is some.

Farewell, lying cripple.

I don't understand either of these reported rule violations.

If I've said something about blocking members, please refresh my memory.

Also, how and where was the website HTML edited?

 

[janoshik]

I don't understand either of these reported rule violations.

If I've said something about blocking members, please refresh my memory.

Also, how and where was the website HTML edited?

My apologies about not being clear enough.

I don't think you've said anything about blocking members.

You edit HTML differently on any browser. On Chromium based browsers you right click and click "inspect element" and then you just edit stuff.




In this case and the screen CBS posted, either exceedingly rare glitch in forum software happened, which I doubt, or he edited the HTML for the screenshot in a stupid attempt to trick you into repercussions against me. Despicable behavior and clear attempt of fraud.

 

[ickyrica]

Despicable behavior and clear attempt of fraud

lol

 

[janoshik]

lol

You enjoy frauding Millard as well?

 

[mands]

You enjoy frauding Millard as well?

He's talking about you being a fraud numb nuts. Man you are slow.

mands

 

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I don't understand either of these reported rule violations.

If I've said something about blocking members, please refresh my memory.

Also, how and where was the website HTML edited?

Since I'm blocked by the other member, I'm lost. I don't even know to whom your questions were directed.

My complaint was in regards to members using the ignore function, not to prevent themselves from seeing posts from the blocked member, which is a voluntary action, as well as the intended purpose of the ignore function; but rather, members misusing the ignore funtion in order to libel, attack, and attribute statements and actions to the blocked member without the blocked member being aware of it, and therefore, unable to respond or defend themselves. I used the example of jano implying that Mands was using his services to make my case. Mands was unaware that jano made that claim until I alerted Mands to janos's statement. That is wrong, it''s an abuse of the ignore system, and shouldn't be permitted.

I don't know if that's an infraction at Meso or not - it is on all social media sites I've been on - but my argument is that the ignore function shouldn't be missused in order to give someone free reign to attack someone from behind a block while depriving the blocked member of the ability to respond or even be aware of it. Blocking is a voluntary action. Being blocked is involuntary. Therefore, if you voluntarily make the decision to block, it should be done with the understanding that you will no longer discuss the blocked member in any way. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

 

[Millard]

My complaint was in regards to members using the ignore function, not to prevent themselves from seeing posts from the blocked member, which is a voluntary action, as well as the intended purpose of the ignore function; but rather, members misusing the ignore funtion in order to libel, attack, and attribute statements and actions to the blocked member without the blocked member being aware of it, and therefore, unable to respond or defend themselves.

I will investigate the ignore/block function. I did not known members were being blocked from reading forum content. This should not be the case.

 

[Millard]

My apologies about not being clear enough.

I don't think you've said anything about blocking members.

You edit HTML differently on any browser. On Chromium based browsers you right click and click "inspect element" and then you just edit stuff.

View attachment 102253


In this case and the screen CBS posted, either exceedingly rare glitch in forum software happened, which I doubt, or he edited the HTML for the screenshot in a stupid attempt to trick you into repercussions against me. Despicable behavior and clear attempt of fraud.

Ok. I understand now. You are referring to editing HTML in order to create a fake screenshot.

For the record, I never ban anyone based on screenshots. For example, I am occasionally sent screenshots as evidence of PM spam. But this is not sufficient because it can be modified. I require that members report spam using the forum reporting system.