The destruction the US created in the Middle East

Discussion in 'Political Discourse' started by Roco Bama, Apr 16, 2019.

  1. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    The loose screw generalized with the term non whites so I though an aggregate of sorts could be used to reply. Without adhering to the white/non whites crap (sorry about being racist btw, good spin), whites are absolutely the front runners in the munitions category. You could also say that is expected since whites make up roughly 70% of Americans.

    I'm not sure if he's Canadian but cdnguy went at me in the same fashion, almost eerily similar. Same type of meme style and everything. He hasn't said anything about living in my head rent free yet so I kinda have my doubts it's him lol.
     
    T-Bagger, brutus79 and FishnTom like this.
  2. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    Wait...
    32% black
    21% Hispanic
    Not sure how your math is (or how Asian’s factor in)... but if I’m to assume they make up the rest...
    100-(32+21)=47%.... which.... is... more than 32% and 21%
    Or did you add them up and compare them because hey BRUTHERRR WHITES ARE GUNNA BE THE MINORITY SOON ANYWAYS RIGHT?
    ITS ALWAYS THE WHITES VS EVERYONE ELSE LOL YEEHAW
     
  3. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    I was the one tasked with photoshopping Obama Bin Nofreedom’s birth certificate, I was also then one tasked with sabotaging the tiki torches at your get together but I was too busy smuggling in migrants over the boarder
     
  4. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    Please tell me my real handle and which Canadian state I’m residing in see if you can guess the city
     
  5. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    I’m living in your head rent free

    Also my previous post had a typo I meant which Canadian Providence do I live in kuz we don’t have states or counties up here so thats aboot it I’m soory but you’re a loser eh but u figured me out all the same good for you.
    At least I got free health care and all the litres of maple syrup I can handle. Also imperial system is so friggen lame
     
  6. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    See this word you used right here, nonwhites? That's an aggregate term. I gave you a aggregate response. I actually don't believe you're keeping up with the class, dude. Don't ride on the coat tails of brutus, it's sad. You notice how he and I can go back and forth like adults? You have to be able to formulate an adult response to play our game so I guess that leaves you out.

    so you're not Canadian. Good to know. Probably a Jane Fonda fan. Do a little reading, I know that went sailing sky high over your head
     
    Jspd likes this.
  7. flenser

    flenser Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    Why are you two going on about which racial division owns the most guns? There's nothing in the 2nd Amendment about divvying the things up evenly.

    The only serious attempt these days to limit gun ownership by race is coming from the Left with plans to insert information into background checks to circumvent due process and discriminate by political affiliation among other things. Based on the censorship going on in Left controlled social media, it's obvious who will be the focus of that discrimination.
     
    T-Bagger and Ultimatepip like this.
  8. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    Just rebuttals from me. You hit the nail on the head. It's not a color issue. It's a government issue. Regarding even distribution, seems like that's a problem. Even distribution would take into account actual percentages of each demographic and then allocate based on that, meaning the larger demographic gets a larger portion of guns. That's just simple math. Can you imagine legislating based on percentages of gun crimes? Yikes.
     
    T-Bagger and flenser like this.
  9. flenser

    flenser Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    I figure if they legislated against the demographic that did the most killing, the government would just have to do without guns. Then we citizens would be much safer defending ourselves instead of relying on the kindness of strangers.
     
  10. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    Technically the second amendment is there to protect you from a tyrannical govt. which you’ll never be able to do or you’d be able to shoot cops who were posing a threat to you in a situation where you’re innocent but perceive a trigger happy cop to be an immediate threat. It’s not there to cover your ass while you shoot black teens in hoodies or get drunk in some farm yard while shooting at gas cans jus sayin
    However yep you got me I did ask if it apply to non whites. Which it still doesn’t regardless of how great you say our shit hole country is
     
  11. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    that's one hell of a way to pioneer gun control. The idea that "all enemies, foriegn or domestic" would include our own government is sickening, but it's a reality.

    “An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.”

    Jeff Cooper
     
    flenser likes this.
  12. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    incorrect. It's there to ensure we can protect ourselves from all enemies, foriegn and domestic. Yes, the government is domestic but it hardly poses the only threat domestically.

    My guns most certainly can protect me from a trigger happy cop. It's not the guns job to certify what's acceptable protective measures or not. That's why we have a jury system in America.
     
    Ultimatepip and T-Bagger like this.
  13. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    please tell me why someone is shooting at these African American teens in hoodies? Is it because they are simply black? You left a lot for interpretation. I'm looking for clarification before I give a substantive reply.
     
    T-Bagger likes this.
  14. ickyrica

    ickyrica Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    American. Lol.

    I'm from a family that's got amazing litigation chops. I'm by far great at it but you need to step it up man. I can't even see you in the rear view mirror anymore.
     
    T-Bagger likes this.
  15. brutus79

    brutus79 Member

    Your gun will no good against a trigger happy cop. I carry a firearm. The best thing to do when I get pulled over is notify the officer of the firearm, because I have heard nightmare stories about cops seeing or finding the gun they weren't notified about... handing them my permit with my license tells then I am a non felon probably in good standing with the law. My interactions have been pleasant when I do this- and once they run my background which has several felony arrests (no convictions) the tension has already been diffused by the courtesy of notification I am carrying- by law I do not have to disclose.

    But- you said trigger happy cop. By the time you know you are in trouble you already have a gun on you. Dirty harry can't draw from concealed without getting a dozen 9mm from a shaky cop. Cops are bulletproof thanks to the unions... there is literally nobody to enforce laws on them because they just threaten a strike (city with no cops?), or they threaten to stop writing tickets (city with no money) and collapse the whole system. If a cop wants to kill you, you are pretty much dead. Your pistol will not help. Pull early and go to prison for life for drawing on a cop who had not drawn on you or even the death penalty for killing a cop, or just take your bullets. Very little choice- it's why they kill 1500 civilians a year (more than all of Europe's last 15 years).

    You are white... don't worry about it. Getting shot by cops for no reason is far more a minority issue.
     
    Eman, Rockclimber, ickyrica and 2 others like this.
  16. FishnTom

    FishnTom Member

    The biggest problems for African Americans sadly is them selfs they kill more of each other every year then any race in the United states and they fight the police more then any races and do alot more crime then any race the statistics are their black neighborhoods are the worst places for them to live cause they are killing each other
     
    T-Bagger likes this.
  17. FishnTom

    FishnTom Member

    You are right about minorities but more white get shot every year by Police then blacks u can google it
     
  18. T-Bagger

    T-Bagger Member

    But that’s also due to the fact that whites are the majority, so the numbers have to be taken into account when it comes to that.
     
    brutus79, ickyrica and FishnTom like this.
  19. flenser

    flenser Member AnabolicLab.com Supporter

    Technically, the Second Amendment had nothing at all to do with individual rights or protections, despite what some founders may have later claimed. It was all about state ratification. The state governments weren't about to ratify the Constitution without an explicit guarantee that Congress wouldn't confiscate or disband their militias. They were rightfully suspicious, but not suspicious enough. They should have held out for an explicit guarantee against the federal government forming and maintaining its own militias.
     
  20. Jspd

    Jspd Member

    that was a typo, I meant to say *your, eh, you fooking hoser

    And yeah would love to see how a black man who’s innocent and told to put his hands up fairs if he shoots back at a cop. Also you wouldn’t fair too well yourself. Most cops want up make cell phone video recordings of them illegal and hate when they’re on camera.
    And that’s because THEY'RE TOTALLY NOT CROOKED AT ALL OR UPSET ABOUT BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE
    / sarcasm

    I bet you're a blue lives matter guy too eh?
    Fricken hoser.