Triple B Solutions

Head back to DNPShreddedlabs thread to defend him if you're not enjoying the TripleB show you don't have to click or read the thread.
Just got a Shredded pack the other day.. Thanks for asking though!

actually if anyone is looking for some legit Cialis, shreddeds cialis is solid af .. just ask TiredandHot’s grandmother :)
 
If you’re going to comment that we all suck then you should at least participate to see how awesome you are at vetting sources.

I can’t argue there... These pages just get a bit redundant and becomes the opposite of vetting IMO. Voices like yours and some other reputable members get over casted. And the main legit reasons this is a dumpster source doesn’t stand out as they should.

just like everyone else throwing there two cents in, as long as it goes against the current target then it’s welcomed, half the people buying online still could careless and buy because there’s too much to read through at this point.
 
Last edited:
LO tests? That would be a cool machine to have. I'm not claiming to be a GMP lab but I did my research. I created a place to inspect vials similar to the method in USP 790, I think you might be referring to USP 788?

This is actually a pretty interesting topic for me and I would love hearing more about it. If you build the machines you likely know more than I do.

You are referring to a quality standard, which is a set procedure and control.. that is not my expertise.

What I am referring to is not just a piece of equipment, but a production line, entirely contained and atmospherically controlled.
Everything from sterilization to capping/labeling, fully enclosed and automated, including inspection.. Which would be accomplished through a series of high tech cameras far more precise then the human eye, designed to not only meet but exceed the standards that you mentioned.

Not to get off track but my point is the likelihood of floaters getting into a system like this and past these cameras is very slim compared to a visual inspection that would be performed by the naked eye.
 
He's an expert clearly all his posts are in shredded labs and Sym's old thread so basically buy the opposite of what he picks.

Surely didn’t stick up for Sym after he fucked up .. but hey, it’s public forums.. it’s clear we all can makeup whatever and hit send .. good thing is no one besides nerds like you will give a shit what my post history is.
 
Omron vision system capable of detecting floaters. $7000

Mozilla file server free.

Post vision station post table application $150

Total cost of have the vision results saved for every vile you produce. $7150

Keyence sr2000 barcode reader $2000

Scanable database with all vision and production results and verification........ As well as anti forging.

This is not expensive or fucking complex.

@Freakmidd

@TripleBSolutions
 
Omron vision system capable of detecting floaters. $7000

Mozilla file server free.

Post vision station post table application $150

Total cost of have the vision results saved for every vile you produce. $7150

Keyence sr2000 barcode reader $2000

Scanable database with all vision and production results and verification........ As well as anti forging.

This is not expensive or fucking complex.

@Freakmidd

@TripleBSolutions

If I were to ever source I would have a vision system that would catch any floaters and as well as any inconsistency in fill levels and color and pretty much anything irregular. Afte vision the product would have a label containing a 2d barcode that would contain every piece of info on that vial.

When a customer would scan it it would automatically bring up the vision pictures and results, verify the product and a image of post table application including 2D barcode.

All for under $10,000
 
If I were to ever source I would have a vision system that would catch any floaters and as well as any inconsistency in fill levels and color and pretty much anything irregular. Afte vision the product would have a label containing a 2d barcode that would contain every piece of info on that vial.

When a customer would scan it it would automatically bring up the vision pictures and results, verify the product and a image of post table application including 2D barcode.

All for under $10,000
That is pretty bad ass.
 
I can’t argue there... These pages just get a bit redundant and becomes the opposite of vetting IMO. Voices like yours and some other reputable members get over casted and the main legit reasons this is a dumpster source doesn’t stand out as they should.

just like everyone else throwing there two cents in, as long as it goes against the current target then it’s welcomed, half the people buying online still could careless and buy because there’s too much to read through at this point.

I get it. This thread is making me realize a number of things.

It’s repetitive because the source avoids answering questions. So same thing gets asked 5-6 times before it’s finally answered.
 
I can’t argue there... These pages just get a bit redundant and becomes the opposite of vetting IMO. Voices like yours and some other reputable members get over casted. And the main legit reasons this is a dumpster source doesn’t stand out as they should.

just like everyone else throwing there two cents in, as long as it goes against the current target then it’s welcomed, half the people buying online still could careless and buy because there’s too much to read through at this point.
As soon as the daily vetting to get testing done stops the source automatically gets a G2G. All the newbs will pile in and place their orders and the source may see no need to move forward with testing as he has no incentive to do so.
So what may seem redundant is necessary IMHO.
 
If I were to ever source I would have a vision system that would catch any floaters and as well as any inconsistency in fill levels and color and pretty much anything irregular. Afte vision the product would have a label containing a 2d barcode that would contain every piece of info on that vial.

When a customer would scan it it would automatically bring up the vision pictures and results, verify the product and a image of post table application including 2D barcode.

All for under $10,000
That's actually awesome, I'll have to do some research. It may be something I implement.
 
I get where you're coming from since I might do the same in his position. He has a good job though and he'll make back the loss in less than a day. If anything were to go wrong however, bye bye good job. Better to cut the loss.


Trip, I might have advised him to take you up on the offer if you hadn't shown a consistent pattern of obfuscating, redirecting, and denying any and all wrongdoing. Your M.O. is 0 transparency and at least with me, you haven't earned any trust. If anything, it's made me see any misstep as another sign of incompetence, laziness, or willful malice rather than an honest mistake.

My mistake was vaguely telling a newbie to search meso for a source since I don't give G2Gs. If I'd known he would order from you, I'd have told him my misgivings and directed him towards sellers with better and more established reputations while you worked yourself out.
Is this Frank?
 
That's actually awesome, I'll have to do some research. It may be something I implement.
Will Ferrell Reaction GIF
 
This may have been discussed before at Meso and if so my apologies for not having seen it. Wondering about the possibility of creating a matrix/checklist/dashboard for sources for the vetting process. Most of this stuff is binary- YES or NO. This would prevent the circular conversation and evasiveness of sources as they talk around topics but never answer a question. Users could then look at this dashboard and then make their own personal decision on whether they're comfortable with the vetting or not. Of course, the question would be raised, "who has the authority to mark/check boxes" but this could possibly be tackled with a like-type feature.

The conversation, badgering and soap opera is definitely entertaining but the evasiveness of simple YES/NO questions is blood boiling.

Thoughts?
 
As soon as the daily vetting to get testing done stops the source automatically gets a G2G. All the newbs will pile in and place their orders and the source may see no need to move forward with testing as he has no incentive to do so.
So what may seem redundant is necessary IMHO.

Again, there’s a difference between vetting and pitchforking or whatever. Since there’s not a defined checklist or procedure for proper vetting it just turns into this.

the less clutter / redundancy the more non newbs will feel accomplished and can focus on fine tuning porn hub searches when we’re bored of the wife.

Knowing that most people can’t bother themselves with clicking back a few pages should tell you that if you’re really worried about newbs and want to protect them then the more pages added to a thread the less you’re actually helping.
 
Back
Top