Why there almost certainly is No God!!

WTF does that mean? Someone tells me I'm not Christian so I'm going to hell and I question where he's coming from and I'm an asshole? My words reveal what? Please people....give me a break. Being religious doesn't give you the exclusive right to be an asshole....I too have the right to be an asshole and question you as an atheist. Oh I forgot God told you it was ok to be an asshole in his name as long as you preach his word....peachy.

Maybe one day all the believers will start thinking for themselves and get that righteous chip off their shoulder. IT'S ALL BULLSHIT!!!!

Little fish, quit fighting me. You have been caught, but dont worry. Im going to throw you back into the pond.[:o)]
I just realized you are a kid and dont even know what your opinions are yet.
Dont be so hateful if you want someone to listen seriously too you. If people dont like the messenger, they dont care to hear the message. Someday (years from now) you will be correct on a subject. Convey your thoughts in a civil manner.
Also, remember you entered this thread on your own free will.
 
The Jews dont accept Christ as the Messiah. That's an egregious offense Biblically.

Christ was God incarnate, according to Biblical doctrine.the entire teaching of the Bible revolves around accepting the Messiah.

That is a matter of interpretation. An argument can be made that the Jews will be saved through their belief in the Father.

John 14:6-7: 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you really know me, you will know my Father as well.

Christ was God incarnate, hence, if the Jews accept the Father, then they've also accepted the Son. If the Son is the Messiah, then the Father is as well.


Sounds all fine and dandy, except God commands believers in the Bible to care what others believe, and attempt to show them the love of Christ through their lives.

That is a Christians reason for existence.

I don't care how offensive it is. God didn't command me to go into all the world and unoffensively preach the gospel. He just commanded me to go. He commanded me to have love for my fellow man. I love the Muslims, even if we disagree.


Does the Bible directly command Christians to proselytize or does it ask them to show the love of Christ through their actions?

IMO, the scripture can be interpreted in many ways.


You think it's fun to tell someone you believe they are going to Hell?

If I am a Doctor it may be an uncomfortable time for me to tell you that you have cancer. So, since it might be a hard thing for you to hear, should I keep the knowledge to myself?

There is a difference between being asked for an opinion and volunteering one. Telling someone you believe they're going to hell requires you to judge them and the Bible very clearly frowns on judgement.

Luke 6:37: Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:

John 8:7 So when they continued asking Him, He lifted Himself up and said unto them, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

IMO, one of the difficulties with interpreting the Bible too literally is that it requires you to follow such a strict dogma, you end up alienating those you're supposed to be trying to sway. It does more harm than good.

CBS
 
Last edited:
Little fish, quit fighting me. You have been caught, but dont worry. Im going to throw you back into the pond.[:o)]
I just realized you are a kid and dont even know what your opinions are yet.
Dont be so hateful if you want someone to listen seriously too you. If people dont like the messenger, they dont care to hear the message. Someday (years from now) you will be correct on a subject. Convey your thoughts in a civil manner.
Also, remember you entered this thread on your own free will.

Lol...years from now you will still be full of shit..lol.
 
That is a matter of interpretation. An argument can be made that the Jews will be saved through their belief in the Father.

John 14:6-7: 6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7 If you really know me, you will know my Father as well.

Christ was God incarnate, hence, if the Jews accept the Father, then they've also accepted the Son. If the Son is the Messiah, then the Father is as well.







Does the Bible directly command Christians to proselytize or does it ask them to show the love of Christ through their actions?

IMO, the scripture can be interpreted in many ways.




There is a difference between being asked for an opinion and volunteering one. Telling someone you believe they're going to hell requires you to judge them and the Bible very clearly frowns on judgement.

Luke 6:37: Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:

John 8:7 So when they continued asking Him, He lifted Himself up and said unto them, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”

IMO, one of the difficulties with interpreting the Bible too literally is that it requires you to follow such a strict dogma, you end up alienating those you're supposed to be trying to sway. It does more harm than good.

CBS

There's the problem....the Bible can be interpreted to mean just about anything you want it to say - even something hateful and destructive - as can the Koran and any of the other big books.

I'm not against the basic idea of religion - just what it has been turned into. Islamic radicals believe THEY are right and God and the Koran command them to kill the infidels and other Islamic scholars say the exact opposite and think they're crazy.

Stretch believes it is his duty to save everyone he can through Christianity otherwise they are eternally damned. Guess what? I have an uncle who is an Episcopal priest who I see often and had dinner with last night...he could not disagree with Stretch more and he believes Stretch's interpretation is completely off.

Who is right and who is wrong? What good is something like the bible if it can be manipulated and interpreted any way you want? What good is it if you can twist the meaning to suit your ideas - how can that be the word of God?

Religion in and of itself is not destructive but people's use of it is.....

It's all too sloppy....too fallible....too human to be true IMO.

If that makes me childish then so be it...
 
Convey your thoughts in a civil manner.
Also, remember you entered this thread on your own free will.

BTW....my tone in this thread became less civil when it became clear Stretch is using the Bible to justify his own little brand of hateful Christianity. Join me or burn for eternity is his message and his message is hateful in my opinion - no matter how justified he feels because he can find some ambiguous words here or there in the bible that he can use to convince himself he's right.

My uncle who is a scholar of the Bible says it is ambiguous, contradictory, open to interpretation and misinterpretation and if you want to get to the meaning of it it's NOT done word by word but in the summation of all the words.

Did I come here on my own? Yes. Did I start this discussion civilly? Yes. Did I take offense to Stretch's take on Christianity and his misuse of it to judge and sentence me to eternal damnation? Yes. Does the way Stretch uses Christianity to fulfill his own agenda tweak me just a little? YES!
 
My uncle who is a scholar of the Bible says it is ambiguous, contradictory, open to interpretation and misinterpretation and if you want to get to the meaning of it it's NOT done word by word but in the summation of all the words.

Right. To get the true meaning you must look at the whole rather than parts.

IMO, Christianity is a philosophy, not than a religion and it's a good philosophy. Unfortunately, the good often gets lost in the many interpretations.

Since this discussion has turned to "hell," here are some different views on hell and what Christ said about it.

18. Jesus Christ did not Teach Hell

Jesus' Teaching On Hell

http://tribes.tribe.net/jesuschristtribe/thread/2a494202-cfee-48d3-a6d6-c78b6b2150d1 (Did Jesus say we would go to hell for... - JESUS CHRIST - tribe.net)
 
There's the problem....the Bible can be interpreted to mean just about anything you want it to say - even something hateful and destructive - as can the Koran and any of the other big books.

I'm not against the basic idea of religion - just what it has been turned into. Islamic radicals believe THEY are right and God and the Koran command them to kill the infidels and other Islamic scholars say the exact opposite and think they're crazy.

I agree about the issues with interpretation and misinterpretation of the Bible, but Islam is entirely different. The Bible is a huge collection of documents written by different people at different times in different contexts, which allows for much greater interpretative freedom. The Koran, on the other hand, comes exclusively from one source: Muhammad. Furthermore, the strict literalism of the Koran means that there is no room for interpretation.

Islam itself is more of a military-political ideology with religion thrown in. Westerners who read a translation of the Koran are often left bewildered as to its meaning because it is not in chronological order and they're unaware of a critically important principle of Koranic interpretation known as "abrogation. I.e., the early peaceful versus are abrogated by the more bellicose later versus like the Verse of the Sword.

Muhammad is considered the ideal man and the perfect example for Muslims to emulate. For example, because Muhammad had a 9 year old wife, child marriage is common in muslim countries and efforts to ban it are met with accusations of apostasy which carries a death penalty under the sharia.

The Islamic scholars who say Islam is inherently peaceful and quote the more peaceful versus in english often say something entirely different in arabic. While jihad gets whitewashed by the PC crowd as a spritual struggle (sometimes it is), jihad is also "holy war" and the commands for violence against infidels in the Koran are there for anyone that cares to look. Furthermore, if someone stood on a street corner in Riyadh or Islamabad and said Islam is a peaceful religion and the islamic radicals have it all wrong, they would very likely lose their head, IMO.

I find Islam fascinating but it is completely different from what we think of when we think of religion.

CBS
 
There's the problem....the Bible can be interpreted to mean just about anything you want it to say - even something hateful and destructive - as can the Koran and any of the other big books.

True. And many have used it for this purpose. If you knew more about the book, you could actually point out areas where you think I misinterpreting it or why. Instead, you are being emotional, and resorting to childish insults IMO.

I'm not against the basic idea of religion - just what it has been turned into. Islamic radicals believe THEY are right and God and the Koran command them to kill the infidels and other Islamic scholars say the exact opposite and think they're crazy.

The Islamic scholars are attempting to reconcile their familial religion with modern day society. And they are misinterpreting the Koran IMO, since the clear message of the ENTIRE BOOK, defines Islam as a militant religion.

Stretch believes it is his duty to save everyone he can through Christianity otherwise they are eternally damned. Guess what? I have an uncle who is an Episcopal priest who I see often and had dinner with last night...he could not disagree with Stretch more and he believes Stretch's interpretation is completely off.

I would love to know EVEN ONE verse which suggests Christians are not meant to spread his message. Jesus spoke more than twice as much about hell as he did heaven. He told people they would go to hell if they did not ask God for forgiveness. Again, the cancer analogy comes to mind IDMD.

Here's another analogy that may help: I have a sickness which causes me to see hallucinations of fire. I drive by your house and believe it is on fire, but I'm wrong. I knock on your door and inform you of my errant belief. Are you angry with me for stopping to tell you in that situation? That's all that happened here, you can believe I'm wrong, and be frustrated by my beliefs. But to be angry and insult believers just makes no sense to me. I suspected strongly that my message wouldn't be received the way I had hoped, and the last thing I wanted was an argument with you. But, try to think about it with me IDMD....

If I genuinely believe that you are on your way to hell, a place of ETERNAL burning where you will never die. ETERNAL BURNING.

If I genuinely believe that is your fate...how worthless of a human would I be to not tell you that because I am afraid you will make fun of me and call me a sheeple? I knew what was coming when I came into this thread. And that fear is what kept other CHICKEN POOP believers who are members from posting, and they should be ashamed of themselves.

Who is right and who is wrong? What good is something like the bible if it can be manipulated and interpreted any way you want? What good is it if you can twist the meaning to suit your ideas - how can that be the word of God?

Man will corrupt anything IDMD. Give us a wonder-drug, and there are 7000 vulture pharm companies wondering how to make money off of it....EVERYTHING we see is like that. The depravity of man is nearly boundless. Which is why I always suggest that no one change anything about thier lifestyle or religion because some preacher told them to. And don't wait for God to whisper in your ear either. Everything we NEED to know, is reinforced...OVER and OVER and OVER again throughout His Word. If someone can't show you repeated verses, from many different parts of the Bible, I would reject their message.

Speaking of which...I would love to see some verses from your preacher friend/uncle...I forget which he was.

Religion in and of itself is not destructive but people's use of it is.....

Couldn't agree more. Hence my response to your question about which "flavor" I am. My definition of religion is a set of beliefs which are designed by MAN. I don't want a "mans" way of doing things. I want Gods way. Which is the reason for my rejection of any, non-reinforced Biblical principles.

It's all too sloppy....too fallible....too human to be true IMO.

If that makes me childish then so be it

No. That doesn't make you childish not to believe. It's a hard thing to open yourself up to. I really wish you would read, "Case for Christ".

I was still fighting hard after reading that book. But it nagged me over the next few years, and combined with some other factors, led me to Christ. I am far from perfect, as I often demonstrate on this forum with many of my actions. To my shame. But life is a Journey, and I genuinely want to please God, I believe he sees the desires of my heart, remains patient with me.

BTW....my tone in this thread became less civil when it became clear Stretch is using the Bible to justify his own little brand of hateful Christianity. Join me or burn for eternity is his message and his message is hateful in my opinion - no matter how justified he feels because he can find some ambiguous words here or there in the bible that he can use to convince himself he's right.



My uncle who is a scholar of the Bible says it is ambiguous, contradictory, open to interpretation and misinterpretation and if you want to get to the meaning of it it's NOT done word by word but in the summation of all the words.

YES! Something I've stated over and over again in this thread...echo echo echo.

BTW I would love to see this scholars verses for not proselytizing. Its a ridiculous statement.

Your accusations of my being hateful are absolutely LUDICROUS. There isn't ONE WAY to heaven BECAUSE I found it. I don't believe my selection of it makes it the best. It was the best before it was revealed to me. I love and feel for those who haven't yet found it, and I pray and hope that they do find the way.


Did I come here on my own? Yes. Did I start this discussion civilly? Yes. Did I take offense to Stretch's take on Christianity and his misuse of it to judge and sentence me to eternal damnation? Yes. Does the way Stretch uses Christianity to fulfill his own agenda tweak me just a little? YES!

Really? Is that really what happened?? I "tweaked" you?

No. You were religiously jaded long before I made my beliefs known. You requested to know my beliefs then ridiculed me for them. The only person who would believe your last quoted section above, is someone too lazy to go back and read the discourse for themselves.

Here is how you entered this conversation sir. Nothing "civil" about it.

Oh Christ! If there is a Supreme being he most certainly is not the Christian or Jewish or Muslim god and he doesn't give a shit if you go to church.

Religion is man-made. Books with stories rationalized by men who didn't know anything about science...these books attempted to explain the unknown. Nothing more....man has bastardized these religions into what they are today....big business, a reason to kill others, a system of control.

If you look to the bible as your answer for how things came to be I think you're a moron. If you think evolution is all inclusive and capable of explaining everything I think you're equally misguided.

Those men who didn't know anything about science, also stated that the Earth was suspended by nothing over 4000 years ago it was written.

Long before the Greek "super-minds" created Atlas. Or the Asians thought the Earth sat on the back of Giant Spider.
They also spoke about the Earth being a circle...

Go figure:confused:

Pretty good for some goat herders who wrote it down a few millenia before some man of science would confirm what God already told us.

There are many scientific principles which the Bible spoke of LONG BEFORE science accepted them. You repeatedly show that you are regurgitating the statements of others..."the bible is full of contradictions" "the Bible's authors were uneducated Goat-herders" bla bla...
 
Last edited:
I agree about the issues with interpretation and misinterpretation of the Bible, but Islam is entirely different. The Bible is a huge collection of documents written by different people at different times in different contexts, which allows for much greater interpretative freedom. The Koran, on the other hand, comes exclusively from one source: Muhammad. Furthermore, the strict literalism of the Koran means that there is no room for interpretation.

Islam itself is more of a military-political ideology with religion thrown in. Westerners who read a translation of the Koran are often left bewildered as to its meaning because it is not in chronological order and they're unaware of a critically important principle of Koranic interpretation known as "abrogation. I.e., the early peaceful versus are abrogated by the more bellicose later versus like the Verse of the Sword.

Muhammad is considered the ideal man and the perfect example for Muslims to emulate. For example, because Muhammad had a 9 year old wife, child marriage is common in muslim countries and efforts to ban it are met with accusations of apostasy which carries a death penalty under the sharia.

The Islamic scholars who say Islam is inherently peaceful and quote the more peaceful versus in english often say something entirely different in arabic. While jihad gets whitewashed by the PC crowd as a spritual struggle (sometimes it is), jihad is also "holy war" and the commands for violence against infidels in the Koran are there for anyone that cares to look. Furthermore, if someone stood on a street corner in Riyadh or Islamabad and said Islam is a peaceful religion and the islamic radicals have it all wrong, they would very likely lose their head, IMO.

I find Islam fascinating but it is completely different from what we think of when we think of religion.

CBS

WOW! VERSES VERSES VERSES!!! I got the spelling wrong three times in the same post! :o:o:o

Since this thread turned confrontational, using "versus" for "verses" must have been a Freudian slip. Yeah, that's it...:rolleyes:
 
lol. Video isn't worth much if he doesn't at least show where it is he is reason about his "dragons"...

The references/comparisons to dragons in revelation are clearly symbolic. No one would argue that if asked. That should be anyones first clue he is full of it.

The only reference to "dragons" where symbolism is not being used is in the book of Job. And the word "dragon" is never used in the description, just a reptilian creature, which can breathe fire.

Most evolutionists believe fire "breathing"/spraying reptiles existed.
 
lol. Video isn't worth much if he doesn't at least show where it is he is reason about his "dragons"...

The references/comparisons to dragons in revelation are clearly symbolic. No one would argue that if asked. That should be anyones first clue he is full of it.

The only reference to "dragons" where symbolism is not being used is in the book of Job. And the word "dragon" is never used in the description, just a reptilian creature, which can breathe fire.

Most evolutionists believe fire "breathing"/spraying reptiles existed.

That's very interesting. I never heard that evolutionists believed in fire blowing dragons.
 
Should Creationism Be Controversial?
Should Creationism Be Controversial? - Room for Debate - NYTimes.com

Last week Steven Pinker made the case for scientific thinking outside the “sciences,” and he annoyed some critics. But a recent essay against scientific thinking (even about scientific questions) prompted a louder outcry. After Virginia Heffernan, a technology journalist, wrote “Why I’m a Creationist,” the condemnations were swift and harsh.

Is it really so controversial to believe in biblical creation? Why are some people drawn to origin narratives like in Genesis, and others to the scientific story?
 
I love George Carlin. I always listened to his religious material with a grain of salt, for obvious reasons.

I wonder how different his acts would be if he could come back do a routine today after he has died and knows the truth. Perhaps if he had come to know the peace and joy that a true relationship with God brings, he wouldn't have struggled with drug and alcohol abuse right up until his death.


Hebrews 9:27
And it is appointed unto men, once to die, and after that the judgement.
 
Last edited:
I love George Carlin. I always listened to his religious material with a grain of salt, for obvious reasons.

I wonder how different his acts would be if he could come back do a routine today after he has died and knows the truth. Perhaps if he had come to know the peace and joy that a true relationship with God brings, he wouldn't have struggled with drug and alcohol abuse right up until his death.


Hebrews 9:27
And it is appointed unto men, once to die, and after that the judgement.

I think it would be wonderful to see his acts now if he could come back and know the truth. He could share the truth that he was right all along, and the Bible is just an archaic old book full of baloney. He could make jokes about how sad it is that so many people in the world a brainwashed by that junk. And he could share with us how true happiness and joy comes from enjoying your life now, here on earth as living creature, before you die and it's all over. And not waste your precious time worrying about some fictional magic land called heaven after death, that is nothing more than a cute little story for people who are scared of dying and it being all over.
 
I think it would be wonderful to see his acts now if he could come back and know the truth. He could share the truth that he was right all along, and the Bible is just an archaic old book full of baloney. He could make jokes about how sad it is that so many people in the world a brainwashed by that junk. And he could share with us how true happiness and joy comes from enjoying your life now, here on earth as living creature, before you die and it's all over. And not waste your precious time worrying about some fictional magic land called heaven after death, that is nothing more than a cute little story for people who are scared of dying and it being all over.

While your flowery diatribe sounds very nice and cute, there's just one problem. Logic.

Everything you just said about George Carlin's opinions about God, the Bible, and religion HE ALREADY BELIEVED when he was alive. He believed it was sad that so many people are brainwashed by an archaic baloney book. This knowledge led him, NOT to understand how humans find true happiness, and share that with us; it led him to a life filled with addiction and regret.
 
The thought of a God makes scientist realize how very LITTLE "we" know!

Which is why many refuse to embrace the possibility, but rather suggest an alternative "they understand" (or at least they think they do)
 
Actually, there were and are scientist who believed and believe in God.
Planck and Einstein for example. But, I'm sure you already knew this Jim, but a lot of people don't.

12.Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"
13.Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
 
Back
Top