Am I really out to the loop?!?!

[Stayingbig]

Okay, I'm having an argument with a person about pinning AAS. I've always known that AAS is pinned intramuscular. I've also always known that pinning subcutaneously that you don't get the same results or it's pretty much a complete waste. I know that HGH, HCG and other peptides are pinned subcutaneously. Am I missing something here because he just seems like an idiot to me. This is his argument.

"I’m not trying to argue with you. You can subq test or any steroid. You’re out of the loop

Subcutaneous (SubQ) testosterone injections are becoming more popular than intramuscular (IM) injections for several reasons:
Safety
SubQ injections have a lower risk of injecting testosterone oil into a blood vessel.
Pain
SubQ injections are usually less painful because they use smaller gauge needles and the testosterone is often compounded in a thinner oil.
Ease of use
SubQ injections into the thigh or abdomen are easier to self-administer than IM injections into the glute or hip.
Muscle damage
SubQ injections cause less muscle damage and scar tissue.
Testosterone release
SubQ injections release testosterone more slowly, which can lead to fewer spikes in estrogen, DHT, and hematocrit.
Tolerance
SubQ injections are more tolerable, with lower self-reported scores for pain and anxiety before, during, and after the injection"

 

[Brekkish]

Why don't you attempt to counter each point he made in this post, if he's so clearly wrong then it should be easy to debunk?
What is your source for "Pinning SubQ is a complete waste"?
I think you're operating on some outdated information but outside of a few specific use cases such as individual lumping, solvent content, injection volume or tolerance for certain carrier oil, its all pretty much the same.

 

[phenominal34]

You haven’t known any of what you said ….

Yes you are out to the loop lol

Most prefer IM including myself. Subq def works tho.

I feel you are just trying to get the ok to pin Subq from us