Resurrecting an old but important thread.
Resurrecting an old but very important thread. I've been doing this since 1972 and started to hear and learn about steroids in the 80s. I was living in Cali at the time and trained at Golds, where all of us, including the pros, went to Dr. Walczak. It was always the liver that was the concern. No one thought or talked about the kidneys. Now, as the limits are being pushed, it seems that it is the kidney function that is also being compromised and of much more concern simply because, unlike the liver, the kidneys don't come back.
Can Dr. Scally, or anyone else, interpret his post? I'm not sure how many here are familiar and educated enough to make sense of statements like:
"results revealed a significant increase in the nephrin and podocin gene expression, plasma cystatin C, and the amount of 8-OHdG in the kidney tissue;"
Is that good or bad? What about:
"nandrolone with strenuous exercise groups, showed histological changes such as fibrosis and kidney tissue cells proliferation."
Kidney cell proliferation sounds like a good thing to me. Like it's regenerating.