Kinikuman
Well-known Member
i just got my bloods back 400 mg a week test cyp watson total test 2626 free test 48 .
@ironwill1951, were you pinning once or twice per week?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i just got my bloods back 400 mg a week test cyp watson total test 2626 free test 48 .
http://www.prohormonepodcast.com/bo...tic-response-steroids-low-vs-high-responders/
At this point i think people are seeing what they want to see. i highly doubt that most people screaming for 10x have ever even gotten a bloods on pharma test.
Is this Watson Cyp from DS?
http://www.prohormonepodcast.com/bo...tic-response-steroids-low-vs-high-responders/
At this point i think people are seeing what they want to see. i highly doubt that most people screaming for 10x have ever even gotten a bloods on pharma test.
Obviously the only explanation is that watson is bunk as fuck!
no is pharm , you need to read .
It was a joke but this place is so delusional that i'm sure some people aren't too far from thinking that cvs is cutting their gear lol
You must be from DS!It was a joke but this place is so delusional that i'm sure some people aren't too far from thinking that cvs is cutting their gear lol
Your argument consists of speculation and reference to a blog post, NOT a study.
Refute the STUDIES that have been posted or step off. What you're doing now is promoting bro science.
Which one sounds more like bro science? Different people with different height, weight, genetics, ect will get different levels on a dose of medication or the idea that everyone should react exactly the same on the same dose? A 6'3 260lb guy vs a 5'6 150lb manelt who just stepped inside the gym on his first cycle who's needle could probably reach through his femur. Use some logic
You must be from DS!
Why the fuck would someones cycle history determine how serum test corresponds with dose administered?
The effects of the drug might vary depending on these factors, but not serum levels of test.
It's a linear dose-dependent relationship. This is a fact.
Your whole argument is the usual 'everyone is different' bullshit that guys use to give validity to any bullshit concocted broscience. Which do you think sounds more like bro-science, saying 'you are all special snowflakes', or 'testosterone is a linear dose dependent relationship'.
How can you say that when the first god damn post of this thread proves you wrong lol. Different people get different levels on the same dosage and when that happens with ug gear people will just scream bunk but you can't say that for watson can you. So now you're just going to ignore it instead.
2x a week .
oh but they're gonna say "the rule doesn't apply to TRT doses!". too bad @Burrr called them out on that and @Millard Baker liked it. "scally" was a "trt doc" so obviously his observations are going to be about TRT patients. just relax, they wont listen to you, they've already made up their mind and will ignore what challenges them.
think about it like this would a 100lb dude running 500mg/wk week have the same TT results as a 300 lb dude?
"scally" was a "trt doc" so obviously his observations are going to be about TRT patients.
Which one sounds more like bro science? Different people with different height, weight, genetics, ect will get different levels on a dose of medication or the idea that everyone should react exactly the same on the same dose? A 6'3 260lb guy vs a 5'6 150lb manelt who just stepped inside the gym on his first cycle who's needle could probably reach through his femur. Use some logic