Excuse me!
What conclusion did I "jump to"?
Which comment is indicative I "insinuated your were an addict"?
Where did I "downplay the significance of your condition"?
A bit paranoid aren't we?
For some folks you give them an inch they TAKE a mile you unappreciative prick.
I find it funny and ironic how you call me condescending, yet you have to claim your doctor status in order to validate what you are going to say next. And I wasn't going to address how wrong you were about your interpretation of my MRI, but I think I'll explain since you feel it necessary to call me a "condescending prick". The radiologist report actually indicated:
"Diffuse spondylosis is seen with the lumbar spine without evidence of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Disc desiccation is noted at L3 through S1...
continued
T3-T4: 2-3mm right paracentral posterior disc bulge effaces the ventral surface of the thecal sac without evidence of canal stenosis.
L2-L3: 4mm posterior disc bulge effaced the ventral surface of the thecal sac, resulting in mild canal stenosis.
L3-L4: 3mm posterior disc bulge effaced the ventral surface of the thecal sac, resulting in mild right and moderate to severe left neural foraminal narrowing.
L4-L5: 4mm posterior disc bulge effaced the ventral surface of the thecal sac, resulting in mild to severe bilateral foraminal narrowing, in conjunction with facet joint hypertrophy.
L5-S1 6mm posterior bulge effaces the ventral surface of the thecal sac, resulting in severe neural foraminal narrowing. Posterior annular tear is seen within the intervertebral disc. Mild canal stenosis is seen."
However, being that you probably aren't a doctor in the first place, you didn't happen to notice the early onset arthritis in the lumbar spine. But this isn't because, you couldn't tell because of lack of images, or poor image quality, it was because you do not know what the fuck these conditions described in the report even looked like. In fact, I actually took the clearest and best picture so as to better illustrate what I'm going through, yet you in all your stupidity proclaimed "Did you inquire which one of your APPARENT THREE herniated disks (based on one MRI pic) will be operated on FIRST (none with "cord" compression yet I can't determine without other views if the "roots" are involved) "
And EVERY SINGLE THING YOU SAID IS WRONG! Because, not only do I have only ONE herniated or prolapsed disc, I also have sever pressure build up on the "roots" and "cord", due to my spinal cannel being abnormally narrow. Again, not to mention that you missed the clear signs of spondylosis in the lower discs, clearly represented by the condition of the vertebrae.
But I don't blame you for not knowing these things, since I'm of the general opinion that you are not even a doctor. But hey, everyone's gotta make themselves feel special right, even if some have to resort to creating fake identities as doctors. Hey it's your life, who am I to judge?
