Not what the label says - Sobering Belgium forensics test

[Ophydian]

Anaboliclab usually only tests for the compound that is listed on the label. So the scenario you presented is a possibility.

One would think that a product that is accurately dosed according to label claims would be unlikely to contain significant quantities of undisclosed AAS. Similarly, a product that is severely underdosed may be more likely to have unlisted, undisclosed AAS ingredients. Unfortunately, Anaboliclab.com has not performed the testing to confirm these assumptions.



I wish Anaboliclab could do this but since SIMEC charges for each substance analyzed, it is not financially feasible.

thank you for the info I figured it was the case as I've worked around mass specs in the industrial Chem industry and know they can only test for what they are programmed to look for.

It would be interesting to see UG stuff that gets favorable reviews yet comes back underdosed go through a second layer of screening.

 

[chapss]

I do think that street gear vs. only the larger distributors being tested is a likely source of the difference of al vs. wedindos and others. All the other arguments that have been posed are valid too, and there are other potential biases we have not even brought up. It's still shocking to see such a different set of results. I guess my stance in this case is that a bit of skepticism is a healthy position to take. I would love to be wrong. I would run way more gear if I was confident exactly what I was putting in myself every time. It's bullshit the health risks we have to take.

 

[master.on]

Anaboliclab usually only tests for the compound that is listed on the label. So the scenario you presented is a possibility.

One would think that a product that is accurately dosed according to label claims would be unlikely to contain significant quantities of undisclosed AAS. Similarly, a product that is severely underdosed may be more likely to have unlisted, undisclosed AAS ingredients. Unfortunately, Anaboliclab.com has not performed the testing to confirm these assumptions.



I wish Anaboliclab could do this but since SIMEC charges for each substance analyzed, it is not financially feasible.

Testing for potency (to detect underdosing) is difficult = expensive
The reason why both Belgium forensics and AnabolicLab won't test for potency

 

[bickel29]

Testing for potency (to detect underdosing) is difficult = expensive
The reason why both Belgium forensics and AnabolicLab won't test for potency

HUH?!?!?! What are you talking about?!?!

Potency is EXACTLY what AnabolicLab tests for on EVERY SINGLE TEST!!!

Hold up, let's be clear, here. When you say "potency" are you referring to how accurately dosed the tested AAS is, compared to label claim?

If so, then I must ask, have you EVER read even one single AnabolicLab test result?

 

[ironwill1951]

you are unbelievably misinformed, I suggest you go to anaboliclab and do some reading.

Testing for potency (to detect underdosing) is difficult = expensive
The reason why both Belgium forensics and AnabolicLab won't test for potency

 

[Docd187123]

Testing for potency (to detect underdosing) is difficult = expensive
The reason why both Belgium forensics and AnabolicLab won't test for potency

You are a mindless idiot. Potency has nothing to do with under dosing or not. Potency is a measure of the drug's effects measured in how much is required to produce the required effect at the required intensity.

Testing for accurate concentration or not is unrelated to potency. Besides, Anabolic Lab does test to see if the concentration meets label claims.

 

[Docd187123]

.

 

[crossfitisgay]

Guys a troll

 

[S.B.C]

I was under the impression that Wedinos gave up on public AS testing because so many sources were using their test results to promote AS sales. When last I checked It appeared they were still testing AS samples submitted by ( I assume ) LE and harm reduction types just not those from the general public.