Sending AAS samples to independent, accredited laboratory in Europe

Would you be willing to submit an unopened sample to an independent accredited laboratory in Europe?

  • No. I could never bear to part with gear.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. I would only send it to a US-based laboratory.

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Yes. But only if I didn't have to pay for the cost of analysis.

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Yes. But I would not be willing to pay more than USD $50 for analysis.

    Votes: 18 29.5%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $100 for analysis.

    Votes: 20 32.8%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $150 for analysis.

    Votes: 4 6.6%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $200 for analysis.

    Votes: 11 18.0%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
I'd like to see a summary page on the website. Like a quick reference table where you can see all manufacturers that have been tested with the products and the results.

I like the idea of focusing on the larger manufacturers that keep generating passes. Gives people some legit options they can feel good about. I don't use any of these guys right now but I'd feel confident if I had to thanks to this program.
 
I like how he makes passing testing to prove his shit is actually legit a special occasion. Lol.

He was probably as surprised as anyone! Lol

In all seriousness, he's probably just taking advantage of the free advertising by AnabolicLab.com to entice new customers to buy from him. Not the worst business move a ugl could make, I suppose.
 
He was probably as surprised as anyone! Lol

In all seriousness, he's probably just taking advantage of the free advertising by AnabolicLab.com to entice new customers to buy from him. Not the worst business move a ugl could make, I suppose.
very good business decision. that site has been driving me nuts lately. the gtg bro stuff has gotten out of control. do like a couple of the moderators and members though
 
M
Good idea - we'll get to work on it.

For now, the best we have is a table of all results that is sortable by Manufacturer, by Steroid, and by Date:

http://anaboliclab.com/downloads/

Also Millard, When you click on browse by steroid name a drop down list appears for a second and then the page changes to "Lab results by steroid name". The first 5 compounds tested are there but Test P and Methenolone Enanthate are not there. I'm using a tablet so it may just be an issue with the mobile version.
 
M

Also Millard, When you click on browse by steroid name a drop down list appears for a second and then the page changes to "Lab results by steroid name". The first 5 compounds tested are there but Test P and Methenolone Enanthate are not there. I'm using a tablet so it may just be an issue with the mobile version.
It's the mobile version, have to use a pc
 
M

Also Millard, When you click on browse by steroid name a drop down list appears for a second and then the page changes to "Lab results by steroid name". The first 5 compounds tested are there but Test P and Methenolone Enanthate are not there. I'm using a tablet so it may just be an issue with the mobile version.
Thank you for the feedback. We've added the missing compounds to the "lab results by steroid name" page.

I will see if I can fix the drop down link so that clicking on it doesn't take you to another page but only displays the drop down list. Currently, you must only mouse over the link to see the drop down list (at least on the web version - I need to replicate on mobile version).
 
What is a pharmacy's allowed error? I feel like someone said it was +/-7% but can't find it on Google. Either way 90% is gtg imo... Not ideal but not a throwaway for sure.
 
I noticed something whilst looking at the pharmacom lab results. The test prop, tren ace, and deca vials (all underdosed) have more oil in than the vials that were tested close to correct dosage.

Compare test E, primo, and EQ vials to the 'underdosed' ones above and there's a clear difference in oil volume. Not sure if it makes any difference to the testing, but if you're getting an extra ml per vial , then you're still getting the same total compound per vial........ I think.
 
Back
Top