Sending AAS samples to independent, accredited laboratory in Europe

Would you be willing to submit an unopened sample to an independent accredited laboratory in Europe?

  • No. I could never bear to part with gear.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. I would only send it to a US-based laboratory.

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Yes. But only if I didn't have to pay for the cost of analysis.

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Yes. But I would not be willing to pay more than USD $50 for analysis.

    Votes: 18 29.5%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $100 for analysis.

    Votes: 20 32.8%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $150 for analysis.

    Votes: 4 6.6%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $200 for analysis.

    Votes: 11 18.0%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
If two labs consistently have results within 10% of the stated dosage, but a third lab consistently has results within 1% of the stated dosage, for the same price which lab will most people choose? This is assuming results are posted by ABL.

Pharmaceutical companies do not have the purity of their products posted in the open, at least not very often. If Watson cyp, purchased from a pharmacy, consistently tested within 10% of the stated dose and those results were published on ABL, which product would most people choose: Watson cyp with a 10% margin of error or cyp from the third lab above with a 1% margin of error?

For the record I would like to see ABL test some pharmacy products as well as UGL products. I doubt they really have a 10% margin of error, but it would be an important consideration when selecting a source. If we have the means to know what we are buying, there's no reason to blindly accept the FDA's overly lenient purity requirements.
 
If two labs consistently have results within 10% of the stated dosage, but a third lab consistently has results within 1% of the stated dosage, for the same price which lab will most people choose? This is assuming results are posted by ABL.

Pharmaceutical companies do not have the purity of their products posted in the open, at least not very often. If Watson cyp, purchased from a pharmacy, consistently tested within 10% of the stated dose and those results were published on ABL, which product would most people choose: Watson cyp with a 10% margin of error or cyp from the third lab above with a 1% margin of error?

For the record I would like to see ABL test some pharmacy products as well as UGL products. I doubt they really have a 10% margin of error, but it would be an important consideration when selecting a source. If we have the means to know what we are buying, there's no reason to blindly accept the FDA's overly lenient purity requirements.
Donations need to start picking up, looks like the people that are donating are donating plenty, just need to increase the number of donors. Spread the word
 
Donations need to start picking up, looks like the people that are donating are donating plenty, just need to increase the number of donors. Spread the word

@MillardBaker

Went to donate tonight. GoFundMe says "there's an issue with this account". Should we be worried?
 
Looks like other people are starting to find this site.
c2150b8f37bbce42f728d262d1ff6756.jpg
 
AnabolicLab.com is committed to continued testing. We've actually gone a little bit overboard. The next round of testing will be the biggest yet with the testing of at least 9 new manufacturers and 50+ new lab test results.

I can't stress the importance of donating to the cause. The testing costs alone for the next round will likely exceed $10,000 USD.

AnabolicLab.com has raised over $12k to date thanks to the generosity of its supporters. It has already spent a good portion of that having paid SIMEC approximately $9750 USD for previous testing. As you can see, fundraising isn't anywhere close to covering the cost of the next round.

AnabolicLab.com needs your help. Please donate what you can. If not a financial contribution, we could use positive word of mouth on other forums and review sites whenever relevant to the conversation.

Thank you!
 
AnabolicLab.com is committed to continued testing. We've actually gone a little bit overboard. The next round of testing will be the biggest yet with the testing of at least 9 new manufacturers and 50+ new lab test results.

I can't stress the importance of donating to the cause. The testing costs alone for the next round will likely exceed $10,000 USD.

AnabolicLab.com has raised over $12k to date thanks to the generosity of its supporters. It has already spent a good portion of that having paid SIMEC approximately $9750 USD for previous testing. As you can see, fundraising isn't anywhere close to covering the cost of the next round.

AnabolicLab.com needs your help. Please donate what you can. If not a financial contribution, we could use positive word of mouth on other forums and review sites whenever relevant to the conversation.

Thank you!


Just donated another $100 on top of my monthly donation. Hopefully funding picks up. To date the program itself has been awesome, it has been a real eye opener.

@Millard Baker is there going to be any purity testing this round?

Thanks to everyone that has donated so far.
 
Just found this site posting up results from anaboliclab.com

http://www.uk-review.net

the site looks pretty shoddy but at least it helps spread the word about anaboliclab
 
Just found this site posting up results from anaboliclab.com

http://www.uk-review.net

the site looks pretty shoddy but at least it helps spread the word about anaboliclab
Advertising and spreading the word are as important as donating
 
Back
Top