Sending AAS samples to independent, accredited laboratory in Europe

Would you be willing to submit an unopened sample to an independent accredited laboratory in Europe?

  • No. I could never bear to part with gear.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. I would only send it to a US-based laboratory.

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Yes. But only if I didn't have to pay for the cost of analysis.

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Yes. But I would not be willing to pay more than USD $50 for analysis.

    Votes: 18 29.5%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $100 for analysis.

    Votes: 20 32.8%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $150 for analysis.

    Votes: 4 6.6%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $200 for analysis.

    Votes: 11 18.0%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
Agree with @redrum720. I think it's in everyone's best interest to keep pressure on labs to provide the best products they can. Just because we have become accustomed to low fractional dosage, or unknown dosage, doesn't mean we shouldn't push for better results. Millard's program gives us a lot of leverage.
 
How many ugls ran through here.
A shit load come in in one month and the next some don't last a day
The ones that do,we have to keep pressure on them
They talk they're the best with the best gear then prove time after time
This idea that became a reality for Millard is the best thing

Hey don't forget to donate $10 goes a long way
 
I'm always gonna bitch at these ugls I accept 95 and better we should too wtf
That's how it starts just lil off the top then bam it's 80,75,70

What? I believe pharmacy grade standard accept and error of 10% but no so sure about it. You are splitting hairs here. I mean... I'm with you about improving production and not selling underdosed product but throwing away the bottle now because of a just slight under dosing it's a bit to much :)
 
What? I believe pharmacy grade standard accept and error of 10% but no so sure about it. You are splitting hairs here. I mean... I'm with you about improving production and not selling underdosed product but throwing away the bottle now because of a just slight under dosing it's a bit to much :)
It usually must conform to USP range of 90 to 110% of the label claim according to US FDA / USP:

"With certain exceptions, a drug must conform to the standards for strength, quality, and purity, including described tests or methods of assay, set forth in an official compendium (e.g., the United States Pharmacopeia (USP)) (section 501(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C 351)). USP monographs for compendial drug substances and drug products usually include acceptance criteria (allowable limits) for potency, along with a method by which the substances or products may be assayed. Potency specifications, both at time of release (release specification) and throughout the life of the product (shelf life specification), include a validated analytical procedure (assay) and a set of acceptance criteria that define the lowest and highest allowable values for potency. A product must meet its regulatory standards over its entire shelf life. Most USP monographs provide that drugs must meet a 90-110% potency specification."

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4228B1-04-FDA-PotencyStabilityredacted.pdf
 
What? I believe pharmacy grade standard accept and error of 10% but no so sure about it. You are splitting hairs here. I mean... I'm with you about improving production and not selling underdosed product but throwing away the bottle now because of a just slight under dosing it's a bit to much :)

I should've add the jk
I know it's not garbage
 
So you read Millard quote?
Between 90/110

Yea it's not a big difference
It's sure not fucking 100 of what they claim I'm not one to stand up for bullshit and they have been claiming bullshit
We shouldn't be bending backwards because they were tenth of a shot for 90 not 100 fucking 90
I'm not gonna sit here while ya feel good about bullshit
 
The only thing I can add is these results wouldn't keep me from purchasing their gear
 
The only thing I can add is these results wouldn't keep me from purchasing their gear

I think I said the primo was under there claim regardless who has been on it and how they feel or felt cause I was looking at them
Same goes here but we shouldn't just be.happy about it they didn't.meet there claims when.all ugl should
 
So you read Millard quote?
Between 90/110

Yea it's not a big difference
It's sure not fucking 100 of what they claim I'm not one to stand up for bullshit and they have been claiming bullshit
We shouldn't be bending backwards because they were tenth of a shot for 90 not 100 fucking 90
I'm not gonna sit here while ya feel good about bullshit

If you want 90-110% go with pharma then.
 
Just the fact that we can have this discussion is fantastic. The multi rainbow labmax results and the X10 rule caused nothing but confusion
 
Back
Top