Chromate
Subscriber
Yes, calibration with progesterone and relative response factors. I am not sure what you are referring to by spike recovery; not something I've ever come across during my HPLC study. Sounds more applicable to biochemistry.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Chromate Analytical Services
- Thread starter Chromate
- Start date
readalot
Member
Spike addition analysis. You would add a known amount of standard to your sample and calculate recovery of that known amount by difference. A "mass balance" if you will given you know the exact amount of your spike. Quick and easy way to validate accuracy over your linear calibration range intermittently. Would validate/invalidate your guesstimates for response factors.
But then if you have calibration standards you'd have calculated response factors. Essentially it is an intermittent quality check on your method accuracy.
Last edited:
Dickwang
Banned
when are you getting an hplc machine… not going to lie… I think I’d actually send a sample off to you at this point…If I were you and actually had this much knowledge… I’d take the risk and do it….
I remember vaguely someone said janoshik gets around 400 tests a week or so
Basic test @120 *400
48k a week… I’ll take the risk of getting arrested for an operating an hplc machine illegally at that point…
readalot
Member
I am happy to help @Chromate (purely academically) although I don't want him to get in trouble. Disclaimer: all this for informational/educational fun.
Let's take your number at ~$2M top line per year If you don't have your legal ducks in a row so not worth it....for me.
To do this the "right" way domestically would take some effort and the reward to risk just isn't there for me. The science/knowhow is pretty simple for traditional AAS and not sure why someone is not making a killing in the US (at least temporarily if they did not do it the "right" way). The legal aspect is the tricky part (cal standards for controlled substances, federal and local laws, mail/shipping). See above and all that legal stuff that was posted.
Last edited:
Dickwang
Banned
The risk/reward is there for me…I’ll buy the hplc at this point…. You come over and run the tests for me… I’ll take the heat if caught….
I’m still okay if we split the proceeds …24k a week is still plenty for me…. Lol
readalot
Member
Haha. Never quite works out that way.
Dickwang
Banned
You’re right brother…hahaha
“Officer, I don’t even know how to work one of those things why would it be mine ?”
It must be readalots… he knows how to use it…
Lol
readalot
Member
Handling Controlled Substances in the Lab
The heart of good controlled substance management is a comprehensive written program
www.labmanager.com
Fed Level:
Example at State level:
Last edited:
Chromate
Subscriber
That is probably more relevant when working with volatile analytes.
readalot
Member
Suit yourself. Everyone has to find their own way.
Chromate
Subscriber
This is from BigBoost:
Perhaps no calibration error after all.
Perhaps no calibration error after all.
readalot
Member
Come on Man.
Dickwang
Banned
whoever called me bigboost22 now you can tell i am in fact not big boost22...let the witch hunt continue doe.....merry christmas eve everyone
Chromate
Subscriber
readalot
Member
Merry Christmas Brother. I wish you the best and stay out of trouble (a sincere wish).
Better for me? No. But that doesn't matter. How is the information content in your second post any different than the first? Actually it does not match.
Test report? Where is Bigboost? What did Bigboost make? I gotta find another guilty pleasure hobby.
Last edited:
Chromate
Subscriber
I ran @B Ware's sample again with fresh calibration solution and got the same result (0.7% lower). My money says the manufacturer "made an extreme error," further illustrating the importance of consumer analysis and why I began this project in the first place.
I look forward to seeing the results from the foreign lab.
Merry Christmas everyone.
I look forward to seeing the results from the foreign lab.
Merry Christmas everyone.
Dickwang
Banned
Does 0.7%lower mean 70%??
So if someone’s sample of 250mg was .7% lower than label it’s actually only 75mg ??
So if someone’s sample of 250mg was .7% lower than label it’s actually only 75mg ??
Chromate
Subscriber
Dickwang
Banned
I figured it would be 70% because I saw the “extreme error” mention …
But I see now. It would be .007 *250mg to get to the number you said.
Thanks.. cbd raws still going to be good to test soon?
Similar threads
