Sending AAS samples to independent, accredited laboratory in Europe

Would you be willing to submit an unopened sample to an independent accredited laboratory in Europe?

  • No. I could never bear to part with gear.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No. I would only send it to a US-based laboratory.

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • Yes. But only if I didn't have to pay for the cost of analysis.

    Votes: 6 9.8%
  • Yes. But I would not be willing to pay more than USD $50 for analysis.

    Votes: 18 29.5%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $100 for analysis.

    Votes: 20 32.8%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $150 for analysis.

    Votes: 4 6.6%
  • Yes. I would pay up to USD $200 for analysis.

    Votes: 11 18.0%

  • Total voters
    61
  • Poll closed .
As I haven't heard of some of these suppliers, could some of the brothers who've used them as the testing results are released, describe who they are. ie, who the heck is novocrine
 
As I haven't heard of some of these suppliers, could some of the brothers who've used them as the testing results are released, describe who they are. ie, who the heck is novocrine

it's an europe brand, it's almost not available Online, only one source that I know has it. they have always kept a low profile and never on the internet.

Quite good for the feedback I had from different friends, everyone was always pleased by it. It's overdosed tough... and I don't like overdosed stuff much.
 
it's an europe brand, it's almost not available Online, only one source that I know has it. they have always kept a low profile and never on the internet.

Quite good for the feedback I had from different friends, everyone was always pleased by it. It's overdosed tough... and I don't like overdosed stuff much.

I agree about not liking overdosed product! I think there is just so much underdosed and bunk product out there that we are conditioned to salivate at the thought of actually receiving something containing MORE compound in it.

But that can be dangerous for the responsible user, the guy trying to truly understand what he is putting in his body, and trying to control his health whIle on cycle.
 
I agree about not liking overdosed product! I think there is just so much underdosed and bunk product out there that we are conditioned to salivate at the thought of actually receiving something containing MORE compound in it.

But that can be dangerous for the responsible user, the guy trying to truly understand what he is putting in his body, and trying to control his health whIle on cycle.

I for example felt quite bad after 5 weeks of 60mg of anavar, so I know that it's better if I keep it at 40mg and not longer then 4 weeks.

But with an overdosed product how can I know that I'm swallowing 40mg and not 60-70?
that's why overdosed it's not good. I'm very picky on the amount of AAS i'm using.
 
Another pass........ Was oxandrolone so expensive back in the day because it was patented as Anavar or something? I've read different things about it, some say the raws are super expensive, others say it was just expensive because of the patent it used to have.
 
Another pass........ Was oxandrolone so expensive back in the day because it was patented as Anavar or something? I've read different things about it, some say the raws are super expensive, others say it was just expensive because of the patent it used to have.

I've heard similar things. That the raw is expensive and what not, and how rare it is to actually receive oxandrolone. However, this scenario may have been more common back in the day?
 
I've heard similar things. That the raw is expensive and what not, and how rare it is to actually receive oxandrolone. However, this scenario may have been more common back in the day?

Just found this on another site.......

I have seen the question asked many times "what happened to Oxandrolone to make it so expensive?"
Those who remember anavar remember is it as a very inexpensive oral comparable in price to dbol. So what happened?
A monopoly by way of orphan drug status was granted to BTG and they are allowed to ask whatever they want for the drug under the orphan drug act. The orphan drug act was made so drug companies who make drugs for obscure diseases get full monopolies on the drug they are awarded this status for. It's an incentive for drug companies to make drugs for diseases that may not otherwise be profitable. Somewhere this was lost on the drug companies and they decided to use the Orphan drug act to line their pockets with drugs that had nothing to do with obscure diseases.

This is from fdareview.org

A sponsor seeking orphan status for a drug need not be the creator of the drug, and the drug need not be new. The drug Oxandrolone had been used to treat wasting in hepatitis patients and had been available by prescription for thirty years. When body builders began to use it illegally to bulk up, the drug received bad publicity and was discontinued. Another company (BTG) then gained the rights to the drug and presented it to the FDA as a new treatment for HIV-related wasting. Orphan status was granted. AIDS patients now paid a price 1,200 percent higher than when the manufacturer (GD Searle) did not have monopoly rights.


Very interesting if true!
 
Another pass
Var from vermodje
Contains 10.7 mg of actual car
Wow very very surprised since this lab is almost always faked
 
Just found this on another site.......

I have seen the question asked many times "what happened to Oxandrolone to make it so expensive?"
Those who remember anavar remember is it as a very inexpensive oral comparable in price to dbol. So what happened?
A monopoly by way of orphan drug status was granted to BTG and they are allowed to ask whatever they want for the drug under the orphan drug act. The orphan drug act was made so drug companies who make drugs for obscure diseases get full monopolies on the drug they are awarded this status for. It's an incentive for drug companies to make drugs for diseases that may not otherwise be profitable. Somewhere this was lost on the drug companies and they decided to use the Orphan drug act to line their pockets with drugs that had nothing to do with obscure diseases.

This is from fdareview.org

A sponsor seeking orphan status for a drug need not be the creator of the drug, and the drug need not be new. The drug Oxandrolone had been used to treat wasting in hepatitis patients and had been available by prescription for thirty years. When body builders began to use it illegally to bulk up, the drug received bad publicity and was discontinued. Another company (BTG) then gained the rights to the drug and presented it to the FDA as a new treatment for HIV-related wasting. Orphan status was granted. AIDS patients now paid a price 1,200 percent higher than when the manufacturer (GD Searle) did not have monopoly rights.


Very interesting if true!

Real var is very expensive look it up and came in 2.5 mg or 5mg
Black market made it cheap
 
Real var is very expensive look it up and came in 2.5 mg or 5mg
Black market made it cheap

Yeh that's what I was saying. Everyone says real var is expensive, so UGL's can't possibly sell legit stuff....... But maybe it's expensive because it's a patented brand, and isn't actually expensive to make, so UGL's can in fact make it?

Just an example, in the UK Sustanon250 costs £2.50 per 1ml amp from a pharmacy, Nebido is £90 per 4ml vial....... Nebido is just testosterone undecanoate, and is so expensive because Bayer have patented the combination of testosterone with the undecanoate ester attached, meaning no one else can legally make/sell it and Bayer can charge what they want.
 
Badass thanks I will be donating this is legit info. Nice to know Balkan and pharmacom aren't fucking around I have a lot of their shit
 
Back
Top