Everyone is entitled to their own opinion...
Serious question though?
What is so hard about understanding that
@MairUnderwood(Researcher) is not staking claim to any of these anecdotal perceptions and comments on Tren. She has merely compiled a list of various things people have said about Tren. Other people's experiences.
She even says in first paragraph "but this is what bodybuilders say, so please don’t shoot the messenger."
Anything she has compiled could be incorrect, but that doesn't have anything to do with her. She is not here to drop knowledge on who is right and who is wrong. She isn't here to correct incorrect statements about endocrinology.
I literally understood everything I read. Most readers won't care about minor grammatical errors because we sucked at proper writing, and English class was boring AF.
Cut downs about her writing style and presentation of the information are way left field and seem like there is something deeper going on. Maybe a past article that rubbed someone the wrong way because she gave an opinion?
I don't have to know anything about Deca, to collect data on it about what people say about it.
"
The following are descriptions of trenbolone collected from forums, social media, and interviews with bodybuilders themselves".
I see a bunch of things being said about Tren. From stuff that I have experienced, to shit that is beyond belief. People using Tren A an excuse to be an idiot. People flat out making shit up. Anyway, It's a damn compilation of Tren stuff.
Again, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but it's easy to tell the difference between something that is obviously personal, and something that is constructive criticism.