From all the posts till now this is how it plays in my head:
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals sees the potential sales of Tesofensine and sources for the material. It gets a quote from a supplier that is low, but since it's a new compound in the market and the law of market skimming is strong, it chooses to start sourcing it.
@Liska obtains a sample and it sends it to
@janoshik and upon testing it it comes back as not tesofensine.
Liska sees an opportunity to bash QSC in the open and gain some of the lost market share after the launch of finished oils from QSC with the option to deliver domestic on ridiculous lower prices compared to his, and decides to give it a go, presenting it as safeguarding for the community.
After much back and forth QSC contacts various suppliers and confirms that although the chemical he sources is in fact tesofensine, there are 2 (or more) methods of producing it and the final compound may have the chemical structure of tesofensine but probably not the same (or zero for that matter) bio availability. We are waiting the second testing from the sample that Liska has send.
In the meantime Bob, James, Winston (names are changed) and a few other guys spew hate or love for QSC.
Liska still thinks that attacking a competitor source is going to generate more revenue by steering potential customers to him, name calling as shill, stupid or worst anyone that raises a different opinion not understanding the basic rule of marketing that nobody loves the retard that spews hate even if it has merit.
Onward lads!